Recruiting class looks goodCharleston Pony wrote:We will soon find out whether Lanier was a good hire. Pressure is on to upgrade immediately and to significantly improve on this year's disappointing results.EastStang wrote:Season over. Let's see what this team looks like next year.
SMU/UCF Tournament Game
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
- East Coast Mustang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 7434
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
What recruiting class?
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 29068
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
I think that was his pointSMU93 wrote:What recruiting class?
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
I thought so too. Just checking
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 29068
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
Next year's class pretty much has to be about the portal at this point. Guys are starting to hit the portal and it would be nice to bring some local guys back "home"
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
KD said he would have stayed and Bandoumel was close with Jank, too — my guess is he would have stayed, too.Charleston Pony wrote:Might have had K.D. and Bandoumel back so it would have come down to replacing the Weathers brothers which would have been a tall order. The 2 incoming frosh he had recruited would probably not have helped much but he might have been able to finish close to .500ponyte wrote:One wonders how bad things would have been with Jank?
It was the right decision to move on from the Jank era as NIT appeared to be his ceiling
Moving on from any coach or GM or player is only a good idea if the replacement is an improvement. It’s too early to say Lanier can’t coach, but the comparison after one year isn’t even close. We lost out best player specifically because Jank wasn’t back, and we stumbled to 10 wins. TEN.
We ran off a coach who (made excuses and) navigated the probation and lost scholarships he inherited, and he won 24 games last year, which doesn’t exactly scream "job stability" to the next coach. When any coach is hired the school always brags about how many amazing candidates wanted the job, but there’s no way this brought out a deep pool of candidates.
Hopefully Lanier proves to be a great hire. We'll see.
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 10968
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
- Location: on the beach,northern Peru
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
Of course sometimes you have to try an recruit good coaches instead of hoping they will call you. OK- re-seat, re-coach. nothing new here.
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
Damn we did win 24 games last year. The hate for Jank was so strong around here that I totally forgot about that.SMU93 wrote: KD said he would have stayed and Bandoumel was close with Jank, too — my guess is he would have stayed, too.
Moving on from any coach or GM or player is only a good idea if the replacement is an improvement. It’s too early to say Lanier can’t coach, but the comparison after one year isn’t even close. We lost out best player specifically because Jank wasn’t back, and we stumbled to 10 wins. TEN.
We ran off a coach who (made excuses and) navigated the probation and lost scholarships he inherited, and he won 24 games last year, which doesn’t exactly scream "job stability" to the next coach. When any coach is hired the school always brags about how many amazing candidates wanted the job, but there’s no way this brought out a deep pool of candidates.
Hopefully Lanier proves to be a great hire. We'll see.
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 29068
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
Never easy to follow a legend. Larry Legend was the best thing to happen to SMU hoops since Doc Hayesmtrout wrote:Damn we did win 24 games last year. The hate for Jank was so strong around here that I totally forgot about that.SMU93 wrote: KD said he would have stayed and Bandoumel was close with Jank, too — my guess is he would have stayed, too.
Moving on from any coach or GM or player is only a good idea if the replacement is an improvement. It’s too early to say Lanier can’t coach, but the comparison after one year isn’t even close. We lost out best player specifically because Jank wasn’t back, and we stumbled to 10 wins. TEN.
We ran off a coach who (made excuses and) navigated the probation and lost scholarships he inherited, and he won 24 games last year, which doesn’t exactly scream "job stability" to the next coach. When any coach is hired the school always brags about how many amazing candidates wanted the job, but there’s no way this brought out a deep pool of candidates.
Hopefully Lanier proves to be a great hire. We'll see.
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 10968
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
- Location: on the beach,northern Peru
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
and we likely won't see that kind of success for another decadeCharleston Pony wrote:
Never easy to follow a legend. Larry Legend was the best thing to happen to SMU hoops since Doc Hayes
- Arkpony
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 6467
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Little Rock, AR USA
Re: SMU/UCF Tournament Game
And of course our administration screwed that up royally!
Long live Inez Perez!