NET rankings
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
- indianmustang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 7861
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:09 pm
- Location: Irvine, CA, United States
Re: NET rankings
smu Up 4 places to 45
https://twitter.com/madeformarch/status ... 7840398657
https://twitter.com/madeformarch/status ... 7840398657
Mustang from India
- indianmustang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 7861
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:09 pm
- Location: Irvine, CA, United States
Re: NET rankings
SMU upto 34 now
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketbal ... t-rankings
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketbal ... t-rankings
Mustang from India
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 29068
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Re: NET rankings
SMU still looking for that elusive Quad One win, Thursday could be our last opportunity depending on how the AAC Tourney plays out. That's the down side of AAC play, i.e., the lack of Quad One opportunities during conference play
- highlander
- All-American
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: NET rankings
How is USF not quad 1 at this point? What did they do wrong?Charleston Pony wrote:SMU still looking for that elusive Quad One win, Thursday could be our last opportunity depending on how the AAC Tourney plays out. That's the down side of AAC play, i.e., the lack of Quad One opportunities during conference play
Re: NET rankings
They are #92 as of today, and have been moving up. A road win over them would become a Quad 1 win for SMU *if* the Bulls rise to #75 or higher. (Quad 1 is different on the road--top 75, on a neutral court--top 50, and at home--top 30.)highlander wrote:How is USF not quad 1 at this point? What did they do wrong?Charleston Pony wrote:SMU still looking for that elusive Quad One win, Thursday could be our last opportunity depending on how the AAC Tourney plays out. That's the down side of AAC play, i.e., the lack of Quad One opportunities during conference play
USF is as low as they are because they started the season losing to heavyweights Central Michigan, Maine, Hofstra, and UMass. It's really just a function of their team not knowing one anothers' names at the start of the season, then they figured out how to play together.
- highlander
- All-American
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: NET rankings
Thanks. I am still learning about computer rankings. This confirms my suspicion that these computer rankings can't (or don't) capture current quality of play.Dukie wrote:They are #92 as of today, and have been moving up. A road win over them would become a Quad 1 win for SMU *if* the Bulls rise to #75 or higher. (Quad 1 is different on the road--top 75, on a neutral court--top 50, and at home--top 30.)highlander wrote:How is USF not quad 1 at this point? What did they do wrong?Charleston Pony wrote:SMU still looking for that elusive Quad One win, Thursday could be our last opportunity depending on how the AAC Tourney plays out. That's the down side of AAC play, i.e., the lack of Quad One opportunities during conference play
USF is as low as they are because they started the season losing to heavyweights Central Michigan, Maine, Hofstra, and UMass. It's really just a function of their team not knowing one anothers' names at the start of the season, then they figured out how to play together.
Re: NET rankings
Correct, they do not really attempt to capture ebbs and flows over the season. If they did, USF today would be higher, and Memphis today would be lower.highlander wrote:Thanks. I am still learning about computer rankings. This confirms my suspicion that these computer rankings can't (or don't) capture current quality of play.
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 29068
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Re: NET rankings
The NCAA committee used to look very closely at a team's last 10 games as an indicator of whether they are playing their best basketball at tournament time (or how healthy they might be at that time of the year). Everyone gets upset early in the season as guys are learning to play with new teammates. Those early season USF losses are really bad losses to overcome because there were so many of them
Re: NET rankings
if we can win these next 2 on the road and take care of busines where we should, I can't imagine not being in the dance
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 29068
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Re: NET rankings
I think we would probably need to win out in the regular season and at least reach the AAC Tourney final to have a strong enough resume to get an at-large bidPony ^ wrote:if we can win these next 2 on the road and take care of busines where we should, I can't imagine not being in the dance
Re: NET rankings
Unless we win the conference tourney we're getting left out. Been a fan long enough to know that with certainty!
Pony Up!
Re: NET rankings
I think if we were to win the next 5 and make the tourney final we would have a good shot, but outside of that I completely agree. We should have been in the year we went to the NIT and got snubbed, so nothing would surprise me.smubrooks wrote:Unless we win the conference tourney we're getting left out. Been a fan long enough to know that with certainty!
- highlander
- All-American
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: NET rankings
This is all speculation, but I think running the table and then winning our first tourney game gets us in. I don't think we have to make it to the final.
If we win the next 2, our NET is going to be in the 27-range.
If we win the next 2, our NET is going to be in the 27-range.
- highlander
- All-American
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: NET rankings
Our record on this chart is wrong. We are 19-7, not 18-7. I DEMAND A RE-CALC!!!!!indianmustang wrote:SMU upto 34 now
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketbal ... t-rankings
Re: NET rankings
Our game against Southwest Assemblies of God doesn't count and it shouldn't. Power conference schools should be embarrassed to schedule those teams.