Re: Grades
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 6:03 pm
SMU response:
http://www.smumustangs.com/genrel/012714aaa.html
http://www.smumustangs.com/genrel/012714aaa.html
an. 27, 2014
SMU Statement on Reporting of DISD Investigation
January 27, 2014
SMU wishes to correct the record on a recent media report regarding the admission of an SMU student athlete.
As with all information related to student admissions, we are careful to make decisions based on official records of academic performance. Using our typical procedures, we granted admission to the student in question based on information on the official DISD transcript and certification of his graduation by DISD.
Several other points need to be made.
Because we care about the potential of our student athletes to be academically successful at SMU, it is not unusual for a coach to inquire about the academic progress of a prospective student athlete. This is common practice among universities. In this way, it can be determined whether the student is on track to complete academic requirements and qualify for admission.
As part of that practice, Assistant Coach Ulric Maligi asked for an update on the student’s grades, about whether the student needed to do extra credit assignments or take an extra course during the summer. He spoke with a higher education adviser who represented herself as the point of contact for the student’s academic performance. Previous grade reports indicated a passing grade in physics and other subjects. Subsequently, Coach Maligi conferred with the student’s high school counselor, a DISD employee, who instructed him to disregard the interim grade report he had just received. She indicated that DISD had experienced a problem regarding alleged grade changes at Kimball High School. This conversation led Coach Maligi to believe that DISD had addressed the issue and that forthcoming information on student grades would be accurate, as DISD has affirmed.
SMU received the final transcript on July 1, confirming the student’s graduation, with grades and credits indicating the student could qualify for SMU admission and NCAA eligibility. The alleged grade change on an earlier interim report was not reflected on the official transcript and thus did not have an impact on admission to SMU or NCAA eligibility.
Regarding the alleged attendance issue, SMU, like any other university, must rely on a school district’s procedures certifying that a student meets all qualifications for graduation. Universities are not provided with attendance records of high school students applying for admission.
With regard to the timing of SMU’s response to queries by the auditors, SMU’s athletics compliance officer was in communication with the investigator in August and September, and on October 4 provided a written response to the investigator’s questions.
It is unfortunate that misinformation has been publicized, even before SMU received the 500-page document on the investigation at 8:15 a.m. today. As DISD addresses its issues with personnel and procedures, we hope that future media reporting on such important matters will be more accurately conveyed.
smusportspage wrote:smusic 00 wrote:ParkyPony wrote:First of all, I want to know who Brett Shipp called 2 months ago and never received a return phone call from. Also, I assure you if the basketball SID or for that matter the head SID knew anything about this, LB would NOT have been blindsided.
This should be cleared up, yes. WFAA reports that SMU took 2 months to respond to the DISD investigation, which they (DISD) were performing at the request of DMN. WFAA didn't have this until DISD report was made available last Monday. No one didn;t call back WFAA. SMU probably had their own people inquire then got back to DISD, who then noted their response in the report.
Who paid for this report? Did my tax dollars go to the invetigation that WFAA requested? Or, did WFAA pay for it. To me commissioned means to financial back. Am I wrong?
smusic 00 wrote:
we hope that future media reporting on such important matters will be more accurately conveyed.
SMU 86 wrote:CA Mustang wrote:Now others are chiming in: http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs ... pering.php
(Sorry if this was posted in the 25+ previous pages)
The article does bring out one good question and that is how did the SID let LB get blindsided like that? I like Brad and I think he does a good job but it does as the question on this situation.
mavsrage311 wrote:SMU 86 wrote:CA Mustang wrote:Now others are chiming in: http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs ... pering.php
(Sorry if this was posted in the 25+ previous pages)
The article does bring out one good question and that is how did the SID let LB get blindsided like that? I like Brad and I think he does a good job but it does as the question on this situation.
The basketball SID isn't Brad, but Herman Hudson.
I can't do much about this, but one thing I won't do is watch tonight. Channel 8 wants to shoot first and then ask questions later in the name of ratings? Great, won't get them from me. I probably won't be watching their newscast for a long time.