Page 4 of 4

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:51 pm
by SCAMP6381
Chris phillips will get playing time at qb .he has played with a lot of fr. he is adequate he will work out for the future.

Re:

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:59 pm
by jtstang
04stang wrote:What i am saying is not just a prediction, it is something that can very well happen...a 9 or 10 win season
...

as far as phillips goes, i think he is a great kid and tries very hard, but is not a good qb. i remember at the beginning of the season you people dogging eckert because he hasnt proven himself...what the heck has phillips proved??? Not a DAMN thing, and without eckert i believe we would have won only 1 game, and i KNOW what im talking about, because i am an athelete, not just some retired bang geek who thinks he know football; aint that right stallion???

I don't know what kind of athelete you think you are (learn to spell, fool, and mix in some punctuation every now and again), but you might consider switching to a sport that has more stringent drug use prohibitions, 'cause you're high--SMU might not win 9 or 10 over the next three seasons.

Re:

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 3:39 pm
by HFvictory
04stang wrote:I have no more credibility here?? Im trying to tell you guys facts because i KNOW what the rules are, lets just say its part of my job to know what the rules are, the only way phillips can get a sixth year is if he takes a redshirt next year you fools...


He can't get a 6th year without a hardship waiver. He has 5 years to finish 4 years of eligibility and the 6th year is not an option without a hardship waiver. The waiver is never granted solely upon wanting a 6th year, but must be based upon factors outside the players control, such as injury. Playing time is not considered outside the players control, however transfers because of coaching changes has been deemed outside the players control.