Page 4 of 4
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 1:53 pm
by MustangStealth
EastStang wrote: The one thing that I've long called for is in fact a Toilet Bowl between the worst two teams in Division 1-A. If any two teams needed some extra practice it would be the worst two teams in the country.
Why not just call it the Sunbelt Championship?
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 2:11 pm
by ponydawg
MustangStealth wrote:EastStang wrote: The one thing that I've long called for is in fact a Toilet Bowl between the worst two teams in Division 1-A. If any two teams needed some extra practice it would be the worst two teams in the country.
Why not just call it the Sunbelt Championship?
UNT...............
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:15 pm
by Mexmustang
Good thread! I really was hoping to deny a bid, give our "wins", if we only win 6-7 games. But the payout and practice time makes sense. Looking it over I would prefer Fort Worth. I can't beleive I said that! But the chance to play TCU vs. another no name would be fun. I still have dreams of upsetting UT in the Cotton Bowl one year.
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:21 pm
by SMU Football Blog
ponydawg wrote:MustangStealth wrote:EastStang wrote: The one thing that I've long called for is in fact a Toilet Bowl between the worst two teams in Division 1-A. If any two teams needed some extra practice it would be the worst two teams in the country.
Why not just call it the Sunbelt Championship?
UNT...............
NTSU and Arkansas State play on Saturday. Arkie State is going to crush them, leaving us with nothing to do but shake our heads in disbelief that we lost to them.
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 pm
by mr. pony
All together now -
9-3 works for me.
9-3 works for me.
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:06 pm
by peruna81
borrowing from SMU...errr....USM:
ANY BOWL
ANYWHERE
ANY YEAR
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:53 pm
by smupony94
A bowl game is a bowl game - sorry family but I am going to support SMU.