What the BCS Matchups Should Have Been

QuikSStang · Post by **QuikSStang** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:22 am

i think the teams in the BCS were fine, other than Illinois over Mizzou. I just didn't like some of the matchups. I would rather see Hawaii play West Virginia and Georgia vs. USC. Having two blowout games just doesn't make sense. I wish all the selection committees would get together or something, rather than Bowl 1 pick two teams, then Bowl 2, etc

J.T.supporta · Post by **J.T.supporta** » Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:33 am

QuikSStang wrote:i think the teams in the BCS were fine, other than Illinois over Mizzou. I just didn't like some of the matchups. I would rather see Hawaii play West Virginia and Georgia vs. USC. Having two blowout games just doesn't make sense. I wish all the selection committees would get together or something, rather than Bowl 1 pick two teams, then Bowl 2, etc

when u think about it, it wasnt Illinois over Mizzou. It was Illinois over Arizona State and KU over MU

if you look back in the history of all BCS games...there have been at least 2 blowouts in 4 years of the BCS existence

and each BCS bowl game gets to pick their teams but not by 2...only 1 team at a time