Page 4 of 4
Re: Facilities
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:42 am
by East Coast Mustang
SoCal_Pony wrote:I think everyone understands the priority of FB and BB over other sports, but in defense of Water Pony, an upgrade to our Swimming and Diving facilities would probably return SMU to Top 10.
No other SMU sport that can make that claim.
I personally would love to see us make that improvement. (of course after Moody and FB upgrades)
Right. Priorities are very important, especially in this time of uncertainty concerning conference realignment. We could win ten consecutive national championships in swimming and no one would give a [deleted].
Re: Facilities
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:45 am
by Stallion
Priorities are for Presidents-when someone signs a Check for one of these projects is when they will get done
Re: Facilities
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:47 am
by b_caesar
SoCal_Pony wrote:I think everyone understands the priority of FB and BB over other sports, but in defense of Water Pony, an upgrade to our Swimming and Diving facilities would probably return SMU to Top 10.
No other SMU sport that can make that claim.
I personally would love to see us make that improvement. (of course after Moody and FB upgrades)
What was that last thing? Couldn't quite hear you...
Facilities
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:07 am
by Dutch
CoxMustangFan wrote:I'm curious where SMU would put an IPF. I'm sure it has been discussed, but I wonder whether an off campus sports facility would be best. I'm sure there is an available track of land east of 75 (close to SMU) that could be purchased and used as a multi-purpose facility for several sports (I think I'm one of the few that hope a baseball team is on the horizon).
Baseball ain't happening anytime soon. If ever. Only way is if were a req for membership in a better conf. Ipf should go where the intermural fields are.
Re: Facilities
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:06 am
by RGV Pony
Dutch wrote:CoxMustangFan wrote:I'm curious where SMU would put an IPF. I'm sure it has been discussed, but I wonder whether an off campus sports facility would be best. I'm sure there is an available track of land east of 75 (close to SMU) that could be purchased and used as a multi-purpose facility for several sports (I think I'm one of the few that hope a baseball team is on the horizon).
Baseball ain't happening anytime soon. If ever. Only way is if were a req for membership in a better conf. Ipf should go where the intermural fields are.
yep.
Re: Facilities
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:15 pm
by Water Pony
East Coast Mustang wrote:SoCal_Pony wrote:I think everyone understands the priority of FB and BB over other sports, but in defense of Water Pony, an upgrade to our Swimming and Diving facilities would probably return SMU to Top 10.
No other SMU sport that can make that claim.
I personally would love to see us make that improvement. (of course after Moody and FB upgrades)
Right. Priorities are very important, especially in this time of uncertainty concerning conference realignment. We could win ten consecutive national championships in swimming and no one would give a [deleted].
Now, don't you feel better? Sad waste of pixels.
Re: Facilities
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:06 pm
by b_caesar
Water Pony wrote:East Coast Mustang wrote:SoCal_Pony wrote:I think everyone understands the priority of FB and BB over other sports, but in defense of Water Pony, an upgrade to our Swimming and Diving facilities would probably return SMU to Top 10.
No other SMU sport that can make that claim.
I personally would love to see us make that improvement. (of course after Moody and FB upgrades)
Right. Priorities are very important, especially in this time of uncertainty concerning conference realignment. We could win ten consecutive national championships in swimming and no one would give a [deleted].
Now, don't you feel better? Sad waste of pixels.
pot, meet kettle.