PonyFans.com

I like the mustangs chances, but I expect after a competitive game it will end in a mustang loss. Surprise me mustangs.

couch 'em wrote:SMU 21
TCU 42

McD gets some rhythm and moves the ball but throws 4 INTs due to TCU blitz sacking him repeatedly and young WRs, plus bobbled catches ending up in frog hands. Defense starts strong but gets worn out on field all day.

Losing by 21 four years in to this when they're at the (relatively) weakest point ain't doing it for me. They better man up and knock the crap out of them.

bump

TCU- 40
SMU- 27

TCU 31
SMU 20

SMU's big advantage in experience gives SMU a Shot but game will be decided by TCU's big advantage on signing date in February 2007, 2008, 2008, 2010 and 2011

Stallion wrote:TCU 31
SMU 20

SMU's big advantage in experience gives SMU a Shot but game will be decided by TCU's big advantage on signing date in February 2007, 2008, 2008, 2010 and 2011

You seem to say this with great pleasure.

Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:
Losing by 21 four years in to this when they're at the (relatively) weakest point ain't doing it for me. They better man up and knock the crap out of them.

That's what happens when in Year 4 you still haven't resolved the most important position in all of sport, especially for a RnS team.

TCU 38
SMU 17

total yards much closer, but return yards, turnovers and lack of QB play are the difference.

SoCal_Pony wrote:

Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:
Losing by 21 four years in to this when they're at the (relatively) weakest point ain't doing it for me. They better man up and knock the crap out of them.

That's what happens when in Year 4 you still haven't resolved the most important position in all of sport, especially for a RnS team.

TCU 38
SMU 17

total yards much closer, but return yards, turnovers and lack of QB play are the difference.

Yeah, you are right. Those QBs could play better defense (you are saying TCU scores 38). I agree, they suck at pass blocking and receiving as well. Hate to see them kick. Wait, we might have when Jones called for the onside. Maybe the lights keep them from seeing the receivers. Thank goodness, we play at 2:30. Maybe they should where black and wear leis as well.

jtstang wrote:I like the mustangs chances, but I expect after a competitive game it will end in a mustang loss. Surprise me mustangs.

That's fair.

Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:

couch 'em wrote:SMU 21
TCU 42

McD gets some rhythm and moves the ball but throws 4 INTs due to TCU blitz sacking him repeatedly and young WRs, plus bobbled catches ending up in frog hands. Defense starts strong but gets worn out on field all day.

Losing by 21 four years in to this when they're at the (relatively) weakest point ain't doing it for me. They better man up and knock the crap out of them.

Having a big question mark at QB 4 years into the Jones era isn't doing it for me but unfortunately that's where we're at right now. The toads may be weaker than they've been in years but they're still good enough to blow us out especially on their own field.

SMU 28
TCU 13

SMU 30
PACHALL'S DO.UCHE TATS 24

45-28 us. Although I am concerned after that thrashing of Memphis. I know they suck, but still. Not at our place, not this time.

Out hit 'em, out hussle them, protect the ball...Line goes off for 3 TD's and 120yds

SMU 28
TCU 21

Ponies 34
Frogs 30

Hunt scoops up a fumble and scores a TD.