Page 4 of 29
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:49 pm
by jtstang
NTSU will stay in the Shunned Belt where they are loved and needed.
SMU, on the other hand, will be riding high as the king of the C-USA hill for the foreseeable future.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:54 pm
by PonyKai
I really love this guy's spunk. He's like the little kid who God bless em keeps putting the fork in the light socket.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:59 pm
by RednBlue11
Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:I really love this guy's spunk
TWSS
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:00 pm
by PonyKai
RednBlue11 wrote:Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:I really love this guy's spunk
TWSS
Boom! Tee ball shot 400 feet.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:01 pm
by MeanGreenMachine
RednBlue11 wrote:Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:I really love this guy's spunk
TWSS
Damn straight.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:08 pm
by SMU 86
jtstang wrote:
SMU, on the other hand, will be riding high as the king of the C-USA hill for the foreseeable future.
jt, you have me cracking up.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:23 pm
by SMU 86
jtstang wrote:
SMU, on the other hand, will be riding high as the king of the C-USA hill for the foreseeable future.
After UCF goes as well as other teams in the conference then SMU will truly be the top with any competiton. I am beginning to embrace the idea.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:44 am
by jtstang
I'm telling you. Think of where we were five years ago. Top dogs of C-USA is pretty good progress.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:06 am
by SMU 86
jtstang wrote:I'm telling you. Think of where we were five years ago. Top dogs of C-USA is pretty good progress.
If UH, UCF, and USM leave we can dominate C-USA.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:32 am
by SMUstang
There is no doubt we are better off in CUSA. We could be in the Big 12 with Texas but it is just a matter of time until Texas blows up that conference. Just look at what they did to Houston, Rice, TCU, Nebraska, Colorado, A&M, and Missouri. Not to mention what they did to us.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 9:58 am
by SMU 86
I guess JT is saying he would rather reign in C-USA than serve in the Big East or the Big 12.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:05 am
by 35straight
Being the best team in C-USA is like being the skinniest kid at FAT-CAMP. You're still at FAT-CAMP.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:07 am
by smupony94
Has the kid in your avatar been to fat camp yet?
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:07 am
by jtstang
Not so much a matter of rather--the BCS $ would be nice--but let's face it, we don't look like we'll be getting an invite at this point, so let's embrace the likelihood and get on about the business of winning.
Think of it as "no expectations" applied to all of this realignment nonsense.
Re: NOW OFFICIAL: EMBRACE C-USA
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:16 am
by 35straight
smupony94 wrote:Has the kid in your avatar been to fat camp yet?
Leave Chubs out of this.