Page 4 of 6
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:51 pm
by JasonB
Big 12 called UH today
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:53 pm
by NickSMU17
they wish...
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:55 pm
by ponyinNC
where is SMT to read the lea leaves for us??
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:03 pm
by JasonB
Mizzou is leaving the big 12. BYU isn't interested. they have to expand to 12 because they don't have a big school to replace Mizzou.
i wouldn't be at all surprised to see the Big 12 evaluate Louisville, Cincy, West Virginia, Houston, and SMU.
I don't think it matters either way. There have to be 6 conferences for the BCS to exist. Either way, SMU will make it into one of those conferences, whether in the Big East or CUSA MWC merger.
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:05 pm
by ponyinNC
why does BCS need 6 conferences? and isn't BCS contract up for review after next year? seems to me they could do anything they want.
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:09 pm
by MustangSTATS
JasonB wrote:Mizzou is leaving the big 12. BYU isn't interested. they have to expand to 12 because they don't have a big school to replace Mizzou.
i wouldn't be at all surprised to see the Big 12 evaluate Louisville, Cincy, West Virginia, Houston, and SMU.
I don't think it matters either way. There have to be 6 conferences for the BCS to exist. Either way, SMU will make it into one of those conferences, whether in the Big East or CUSA MWC merger.
So to replace one high value team they need to add multiple low value teams, you do realize they divide revenue by number of members, so they would go from making slightly less money per team to even less money per team.
Also by what rule does there have to be 6 BCS conferences?
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:57 pm
by PonyKai
Not gonna lie, Mizzou has looked like complete clowns throughout this ENTIRE realignment. Pleading to the Big 10, whining about the Big 12, begging the SEC, trying to leverage SEC for a Big 10, dragging on....and on....and on....and on. If you're going to do it, do it like TCU/Pitt/Syracuse did it. One day you wake up, and poof, done. Clean, simple, fast. They're embarrassing.
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:01 pm
by MustangSTATS
I'm sure every SEC school welcomes an easy W and more money, but is there any proof Mizzou has the votes?
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:03 pm
by PonyPlayer4
When is our rivals site gonna say we are gone?
Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:04 pm
by smupony94
PonyPlayer4 wrote:When is our rivals site gonna say we are gone?
I will issue official notice which Dutch will issue via 1st and 10 Twitter
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 5:52 pm
by S....M....U
MIZZOU and SMU to SEC
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 5:53 pm
by S....M....U
just wait and see
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 5:57 pm
by StallionsModelT
"Done deal"
Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 5:59 pm
by smupony94
StallionsModelT wrote:"Done deal"
SMU to SEC?
Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 5:59 pm
by ColoStang
Kate H Just tweeted:
Source: no face-to-face meetings between SMU and Big East today, but all on track, hope meet soon
So....we still know nothing.....