Page 4 of 8

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:18 pm
by Mustangs_Maroons
Cougar King wrote:
skurtn wrote:Well, it's pretty easy to understand why SMU's record is what it is.
You know, recovering from death penalty, more universities to contend with, smaller school, etc.
What's UH's excuse? Certainly isn't the education requirements...


New players filling in for a lot of seniors at the skill positions we had last year, just broke in our 5-star receiver, something your team wouldn't know anything about. You should worry about the frogs coming in your house tomorrow. We'll invade Ford in a few weeks from now, so hold your horses.


If you're referring to Greenberry, that was quite a coup. It just goes to show you how irrational young kids can be to turn down a school that is leaps and bounds above UH in both academics and on the football field. I guess that's why it made national headlines how someone would turn turn ND for UH. He was a 4-star receiver, not 5-star.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:25 pm
by Cougar King
Mustangs_Maroons wrote:
Cougar King wrote:
skurtn wrote:Well, it's pretty easy to understand why SMU's record is what it is.
You know, recovering from death penalty, more universities to contend with, smaller school, etc.
What's UH's excuse? Certainly isn't the education requirements...


New players filling in for a lot of seniors at the skill positions we had last year, just broke in our 5-star receiver, something your team wouldn't know anything about. You should worry about the frogs coming in your house tomorrow. We'll invade Ford in a few weeks from now, so hold your horses.


If you're referring to Greenberry, that was quite a coup. It just goes to show you how irrational young kids can be to turn down a school that is leaps and bounds above UH in both academics and on the football field. I guess that's why it made national headlines how someone would turn turn ND for UH. He was a 4-star receiver, not 5-star.[/quote]


On rivals he was 4 stars and on Scout and ESPN he was 5 stars. We've had other 4 star guys in the past, as for the part i bolded. Don't get mad at us because we out-recruit you guys year in and out. Blame JJ and the lack of cajones to go out and offer the blue chips. Oh and the starting QB on one of the best hs teams in the country is a UH commit. (Yes, he chose us over multiple ACC offers).

Like I said, worry about TCU. The smacktalk can continue on the week we come up to Dallas and take over your stadium.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:27 pm
by sbsmith
Mustangs_Maroons wrote:
Cougar King wrote:
skurtn wrote:Well, it's pretty easy to understand why SMU's record is what it is.
You know, recovering from death penalty, more universities to contend with, smaller school, etc.
What's UH's excuse? Certainly isn't the education requirements...


New players filling in for a lot of seniors at the skill positions we had last year, just broke in our 5-star receiver, something your team wouldn't know anything about. You should worry about the frogs coming in your house tomorrow. We'll invade Ford in a few weeks from now, so hold your horses.


If you're referring to Greenberry, that was quite a coup. It just goes to show you how irrational young kids can be to turn down a school that is leaps and bounds above UH in both academics and on the football field. I guess that's why it made national headlines how someone would turn turn ND for UH. He was a 4-star receiver, not 5-star.



Think he's probably regretting that decision now eh?

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:28 pm
by Cougar King
sbsmith wrote:
Think he's probably regretting that decision now eh?


You wish.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:37 pm
by sbsmith
Cougar King wrote:
sbsmith wrote:
Think he's probably regretting that decision now eh?


You wish.




No skin off my back, he's the one that gave up Notre Dame to go to some ghetto junior college. At least he'll be learning about slinging rock from the pros.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:37 pm
by tristatecoog
My dad went to Paschall High.

Go Ponies!

I don't think many Coogs make it to the SMU game this year, on a Thursday night, but am heartened that "Cougar King" will be there.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:38 pm
by SMU2007
pachall is one of the biggest douchers out there. hope he gets his sh*t rocked tomorrow

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:39 pm
by Mustangs_Maroons
sbsmith wrote:
Think he's probably regretting that decision now eh?


How could he not? Probably didn't have the benefit of discussing with family to guide him into making a decision that will impact his future.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:41 pm
by Deep Purple
Mustangs_Maroons wrote:Logic is this is the first time ever this has happened and in every other ranking (US News for undergrad and MBA) and Business week for MBA programs, we're miles ahead.


Miles? No. There are 3,300 colleges and universities in the nation. That means the ranking difference between TCU and SMU is almost exactly 1%.

Don't know about logic, but math isn't your strong suit.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:43 pm
by tristatecoog
Mustangs_Maroons wrote:
sbsmith wrote:
Think he's probably regretting that decision now eh?


How could he not? Probably didn't have the benefit of discussing with family to guide him into making a decision that will impact his future.


Regret is a complex thing. He's started at UH since the first game. Does BLM regret leaving an outstanding school like SMU for the tundra of eastern Washington?

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:46 pm
by Cougar King
sbsmith wrote:


No skin off my back, he's the one that gave up Notre Dame to go to some ghetto junior college. At least he'll be learning about slinging rock from the pros.


Gotta love garden variety racism. I think you should worry about your players bashing their own fanbase in the newspaper again. :lol:


tristatecoog wrote:Regret is a complex thing. He's started at UH since the first game. Does BLM regret leaving an outstanding school like SMU for the tundra of eastern Washington?


I forgot about BLM. EWU may be an FCS team but they sure as hell fill up their stadium plus their students and community supports the team. JJ really screwed the pooch on that one.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:49 pm
by Mustangs_Maroons
Deep Purple wrote:
Mustangs_Maroons wrote:Logic is this is the first time ever this has happened and in every other ranking (US News for undergrad and MBA) and Business week for MBA programs, we're miles ahead.


Miles? No. There are 3,300 colleges and universities in the nation. That means the ranking difference between TCU and SMU is almost exactly 1%.

Don't know about logic, but math isn't your strong suit.


I get it. You're quite the joker. LOL. It's a phrase used when there is a significant gap, and I'm going off those that are ranked. I don't include community colleges in my data set as you're likely accustomed to.

Math contest would be fun with against a toad. By the way, don't you have your own fan boards to talk your gibberish. It amazes me why you're here.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:59 pm
by sbsmith
Cougar King wrote:
sbsmith wrote:


No skin off my back, he's the one that gave up Notre Dame to go to some ghetto junior college. At least he'll be learning about slinging rock from the pros.


Gotta love garden variety racism. I think you should worry about your players bashing their own fanbase in the newspaper again. :lol:


tristatecoog wrote:Regret is a complex thing. He's started at UH since the first game. Does BLM regret leaving an outstanding school like SMU for the tundra of eastern Washington?


I forgot about BLM. EWU may be an FCS team but they sure as hell fill up their stadium plus their students and community supports the team. JJ really screwed the pooch on that one.




I never worry about SMU producing literate athletes, Coog High should look into doing that some time maybe they'd produce something more than felons and waiters.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:16 pm
by Cougar King
sbsmith wrote:

I never worry about SMU producing literate athletes, Coog High should look into doing that some time maybe they'd produce something more than felons and waiters.



That's funny considering there haven't been any UH players arrested in recent memory. Yet, SMU players are buying prostitutes and sexually assaulting women. Coog high? You must be at least 40-50 years old, nobody my age has that perception of UH. You really suck at smack talk.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:25 pm
by sbsmith
Cougar King wrote:
sbsmith wrote:

I never worry about SMU producing literate athletes, Coog High should look into doing that some time maybe they'd produce something more than felons and waiters.



That's funny considering there haven't been any UH players arrested in recent memory. Yet, SMU players are buying prostitutes and sexually assaulting women. Coog high? You must be at least 40-50 years old, nobody my age has that perception of UH. You really suck at smack talk.




You need to leave the ghetto some time, I'm not sure how old you are (probably old enough to be tried as an adult) but the perception of Coog High in this state is not favorable. Just ask the Rice grads you beg for tips.