Page 4 of 5
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:58 pm
by mustangxc
Billy Joe wrote:Non-conference schedule way too hard. Next year's is brutal too. We must ease up on the non-conference schedule. It does more harm than good playing BCS teams that have had bulit in advantages over us for 20 plus years. We should be 3-1 going into conference play and not 1-3. Team morale is low and fans are already losing interest. Attendance will be much lower with a team with a losing record midway through the season than a team with a winning record. People in the AD's office that are responsible for this mess should be fired or kicked really hard in the groin area.
I am curious why you are such a big June Jones defender given how much vitriol you tossed at Doherty.
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:13 pm
by Mustangs35SMU
Comet wrote:What happens to this thread when we lose in El Paso?
I have full confidence JJ and his supporters will come up with a valid excuse for losing to UTEP.
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:16 pm
by Junior
Yet if we win the anti-JJ people will still be [deleted].
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:27 pm
by Comet
Junior wrote:Yet if we win the anti-JJ people will still be [deleted].
Not if we win convincingly with a good offensive performance. Then there might be hope that this offense is trending upward and is prepared to challenge for a CUSA championship. If we're not challenging that by year 5, June has got to go.
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:36 pm
by sbsmith
Comet wrote:What happens to this thread when we lose in El Paso?
"UTEP is really good, I think they could beat Baylor, A&M and TCU"
"Give the players more time, they're really starting to get it"
"That's okay, we never win in El Paso"
"1-4 is not that bad, we can still win the C-USA title"
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:02 pm
by SMU_Alumni11
Comet wrote:What happens to this thread when we lose in El Paso?
Reality hitting those who still support JJ in the face
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:03 am
by SMU 86
Sounds like the new AD is going to lighten up the schedule in future years.
http://smu.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1417227
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:21 am
by redpony
Sounds like jj told him no real OOC games - just patsies that will make us look good. Guess that would leave out ULM, La tech etc. If we hurry maybe we can schedule UTSA before they can get competitive with us.
IIRC- hart also said no IPF in the near future.
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:46 am
by SMU 86
redpony wrote:Sounds like jj told him no real OOC games - just patsies that will make us look good. Guess that would leave out ULM, La tech etc. If we hurry maybe we can schedule UTSA before they can get competitive with us.
IIRC- hart also said no IPF in the near future.
Looks like Coach Jones has an AD that has his ear. I do hope he puts more priority on the IPF as well.
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 11:00 am
by SMU 86
As far as coach after JJ retires, I would say UT Chat Coach Russ Huesman will be in the running.
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 11:12 am
by redpony
at which time the CoC drops their financial support for a coach.
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 11:32 am
by DiamondM
redpony wrote:
IIRC- hart also said no IPF in the near future.
Good, because our team clearly needs to practice in inclement weather so they can play games in them.
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 11:53 am
by goldenstang
SMU 86 wrote:Treadway21 wrote:Yes make OOC schedule easier with teams no one in Dallas wants to watch. Great idea. The good news is by playing TCU, Baylor, and A and M is that we really know how far away we are from being a top 25 team. We had a reality check and it is not pretty.
We have to think wins more than attendance. JJ did say on TXA 21 that the job of the AD is to get the team to 4-0 in OOC.
F June for saying this, It is his damn job. Tired of him deflecting blame elsewhere.
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:59 pm
by Billy Joe
I support June Jones and think he has done a good job in getting us to 3 bowl games and winning 2 of them. I do not agree with how he handled the ASU fiasco and would not have been disapointed if SMU told him to leave. His ASU flirtation cost us a lot of recruits and other coaches are using it against him in current recruiting. I agree he needs to step it up in recruiting and hire younger assistants that are more aggressive in recruiting. I do not blame June for being 1-3. You cannot realistically expect us to beat Baylor and A&M when those schools have out recruited us for 20 years and had the benefits of being in a high profile BCS conference. We should of beat TCU and June's playcalling on the 1st and goal from the 1 was flatout awful and cost us a td. Wins and bowl games are much more important than trying to prove ourselves against programs that have been in BCS conferences for 20 years. I simply don't agree with the tough non-conference schedule - maybe after 5-6 straight bowl games but not now.
Re: Not the coaching, it is the scheduling
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:06 pm
by Rebel10
sbsmith wrote:Comet wrote:What happens to this thread when we lose in El Paso?
"UTEP is really good, I think they could beat Baylor, A&M and TCU"
"Give the players more time, they're really starting to get it"
"That's okay, we never win in El Paso"
"1-4 is not that bad, we can still win the C-USA title"
And one of the favorite June Jones to the death supporter sayings before a game to get everyone set up just in case SMU loses is that team really "scares me."
