PonyFans.com

malonish wrote:

Nacho wrote:we played the hardest ooc schedule in the country. why did you want to go 0-4?

i would be glad to win the acc.
loserville has played a very easy schedule. if you want to get on somebody get on them. it has been a cake walk.
we can beat uofh. they are no big deal but they may beat loserville.
ucf will be very tough there.
there is no disgrace if we win this conference.

You need some coffee Nacho

ACC-> AAC
UCF is a home game.

i did see the acc but i left it because it made me feel better.
i change my ucf to pick'em.

(Though winning the ACC would be fine too)

Stallion wrote:SMU fans are too frightened to even play BCS schools. SMU hasn't earned jack and there aren't many signs it will earn jack.

SMU2007 wrote: I don't think there's a single smu fan that doesn't want to beat the big boys, but we don't have a team that can compete and it doesn't look like we will anytime soon.

SMU2007 wrote:I don't think there's a single smu fan that doesn't want to beat the big boys, but we don't have a team that can compete and it doesn't look like we will anytime soon.

SMUer wrote:The RbS was supposed to make it so that if we lose, we'd only lose in a shoot out...not lose by 21+ unfortunately. Looked good on paper..

Stallion wrote:The Mind of too Many Ponyfans: If we raised the number of AAC teams ranked above 100 in computer bowls from 4 to about 8 then we'd have a great shot at the BCS. How about instead we build a program worthy of earning true BCS respect

Stallion wrote:SMU's schedule is going to be ranked about 70-75th toughest schedule by seasons end. 5th toughest in Texas. You can make an argument it is the 6th toughest in Texas at least from a AAC perspective since UH plays Louisville-who we don't and play Louisville and UCF on the road. SMU ducked Baylor a traditional rival at Home., avoided Louisville, they avoided Boise St. SMU can be bowl eligible w/o beating a Top 70 team in what they are touting as a BCS conference-SMU fans are [deleted] down their legs because they are playing a schedule that will end up about at least 50 slots below TCU's schedule

Lebanese4Life wrote:

ponyboy wrote:We've earned upper second tier status. We're a top 55 school instead of a school in the 115 of 120 range pre JJ.

Before anyone goes there, it''s not good enough. Let's keep going. But we've earned *something*

Ponyboy = JJ????

We are nowhere near the 55th best team in the nation. You're biased support for JJ is disgusting. Be honest, what is your relation to JJ?

SMU2007 wrote:Our schedule is an embarrassment but the poor performance of the team against that schedule is even more of an embarrassment. Actually, it isnt poor performance. There just is a lack of talent which is 100% on this staff. I don't know what that has to do with fans "p*ssing down their legs". This team is near the bottom of the college football pile and no amount of scheduling hard or easy teams is going to change that. Here's an idea: recruit harder you lazy b*stards.

SMU2007 wrote:Our schedule is an embarrassment but the poor performance of the team against that schedule is even more of an embarrassment. Actually, it isnt poor performance. There just is a lack of talent which is 100% on this staff. I don't know what that has to do with fans "p*ssing down their legs". This team is near the bottom of the college football pile and no amount of scheduling hard or easy teams is going to change that. Here's an idea: recruit harder you lazy b*stards.