Page 4 of 4

Re: Stats 2000-2013

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:46 pm
by PonyKai
ponyboy wrote:See, you can say that without hate and pitchforks.


But then where's all the fun of an unruly lynch mob?

Re: Stats 2000-2013

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:56 pm
by PonyTime
Stallion wrote:Missouri game was in Rossley's last year I believe-remember that one in Cotton Bowl


You are correct - Mizzou at Cotton Bowl. Missed extra point and missed FGs. We could have won at Mizzou as well. Also missed FGs that would have beaten UCLA at the Rose Bowl as well as vs. A&M at Alamodome.

And the La Tech blowout was to start Caven's last year - not Phil's first - to give credit where it is due.

Re: Stats 2000-2013

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 6:47 pm
by ponyboy
Stlhockeyguy02 wrote:
ponyboy wrote:See, you can say that without hate and pitchforks.


But then where's all the fun of an unruly lynch mob?


:lol:

Re: Stats 2000-2013

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:38 pm
by couch 'em
ponyboy wrote:Including bowl games would be a start.


I will do this for you when I get a second, but it doesn't change the end result very much as you saw with Fresno. Pitt was 69.65 and Nevada was 69.43.

In response to the question about Texas teams, yes durung JJ the P5 teams are stronger, as is the botton half of CUSA. This is why I chose to look at 3 best wins and 3 worst losses (by rating). A really good team who beats a 90 sagarin team but has to play a bunch of 40 sagarin teams may have a final sagarin rating lower that a team that beat nothing but solid 70s teams. But isn't the team who beat tge stronger team probably better?

Re: Stats 2000-2013

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:44 pm
by Stallion
Ex. TCU had a Strength of Schedule of 21 and SMU about 70. SMU had a better record but got trounced on the field by TCU

Re: Stats 2000-2013

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:07 pm
by SMU 86
couch 'em wrote:
ponyboy wrote:Including bowl games would be a start.


I will do this for you when I get a second, but it doesn't change the end result very much as you saw with Fresno. Pitt was 69.65 and Nevada was 69.43.

In response to the question about Texas teams, yes durung JJ the P5 teams are stronger, as is the botton half of CUSA. This is why I chose to look at 3 best wins and 3 worst losses (by rating). A really good team who beats a 90 sagarin team but has to play a bunch of 40 sagarin teams may have a final sagarin rating lower that a team that beat nothing but solid 70s teams. But isn't the team who beat tge stronger team probably better?


Lemur. Couchem your avatar is flat out hilarious.

Re: Stats 2000-2013

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:26 pm
by couch 'em
"Dissatisfaction Lemur" cracked me up

Re: Stats 2000-2013

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:35 pm
by ebrooks11
couch 'em wrote:"Dissatisfaction Lemur" cracked me up

meh

Re: Stats 2000-2013

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:40 pm
by Rebel10
ebrooks11 wrote:
couch 'em wrote:"Dissatisfaction Lemur" cracked me up

meh


meha haha. :lol: