NCAA Investigation?

Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
Bergermeister
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7132
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 3:01 am
Location: University Park

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by Bergermeister »

smusportspage wrote:There you go again talking sense and not letting speculation get in the way of reality.

I hate it when that happens.
User avatar
Topper
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2305
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
Location: 19th Hole

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by Topper »

Puckhead48E wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but the school refused to join in the legal response to the death penalty. This led to the ruling that they lacked standing. This was pointed out many times during the PSU case where the state threatened to sue. I would say the softer approach would work better, but that goes against recent examples where the NCAA had been shown to new weak and relatively powerless. I wouldn't roll in with the whole dream team...just an impressive enough line to deliver the message that we will make it our goal to decimate the very foundation of the NCAA's existence of our penalty is anywhere within the same galaxy as UNC-VoTech Institute of the UnApplied Sciences.


You are correct. BTW, study how Jerry Tarkanian fought and won against the NCAA during the time period when we were given the DP. Totally different strategy and totally different outcome. There was a longstanding contingent at SMU who wanted to end varsity sports when the scandal hit in the 80s and they leapt to fill the power void when everyone else was implicated. They actually were happy to see the downfall of athletics. A handful of SMU supporters kept the whole thing on life support until some of the big cigars decided to devote their resources to save Division 1 sports. So here we are.
Puckhead48E
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by Puckhead48E »

Topper wrote:
Puckhead48E wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but the school refused to join in the legal response to the death penalty. This led to the ruling that they lacked standing. This was pointed out many times during the PSU case where the state threatened to sue. I would say the softer approach would work better, but that goes against recent examples where the NCAA had been shown to new weak and relatively powerless. I wouldn't roll in with the whole dream team...just an impressive enough line to deliver the message that we will make it our goal to decimate the very foundation of the NCAA's existence of our penalty is anywhere within the same galaxy as UNC-VoTech Institute of the UnApplied Sciences.


You are correct. BTW, study how Jerry Tarkanian fought and won against the NCAA during the time period when we were given the DP. Totally different strategy and totally different outcome. There was a longstanding contingent at SMU who wanted to end varsity sports when the scandal hit in the 80s and they leapt to fill the power void when everyone else was implicated. They actually were happy to see the downfall of athletics. A handful of SMU supporters kept the whole thing on life support until some of the big cigars decided to devote their resources to save Division 1 sports. So here we are.


Get all these kids and their balls off my lawn!!!

First, I am sure we know what we are getting.
Second, I am sure everyone who finds a date on the internet thinks the photo is actually the person they are about to meet.
Third, I am 100% sure anyone who thinks the word of the NCAA or the pictures on Tinder are trustworthy is an idiot.

I bet we are certain we know our fate at the hands of the hypocrites...but I know we would all sleep much better if they publicly released that ruling and went on the record.

I also want to know if we get a discount for all services rendered for SMU by our esteemed former recruiter's new company? I mean, we get the pain and he gets a new job...a little payback never got anyone in trouble....oh crap, and here we go again!
hoopmanx
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4871
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:36 am

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by hoopmanx »

Puckhead48E wrote:
Topper wrote:
Puckhead48E wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but the school refused to join in the legal response to the death penalty. This led to the ruling that they lacked standing. This was pointed out many times during the PSU case where the state threatened to sue. I would say the softer approach would work better, but that goes against recent examples where the NCAA had been shown to new weak and relatively powerless. I wouldn't roll in with the whole dream team...just an impressive enough line to deliver the message that we will make it our goal to decimate the very foundation of the NCAA's existence of our penalty is anywhere within the same galaxy as UNC-VoTech Institute of the UnApplied Sciences.


You are correct. BTW, study how Jerry Tarkanian fought and won against the NCAA during the time period when we were given the DP. Totally different strategy and totally different outcome. There was a longstanding contingent at SMU who wanted to end varsity sports when the scandal hit in the 80s and they leapt to fill the power void when everyone else was implicated. They actually were happy to see the downfall of athletics. A handful of SMU supporters kept the whole thing on life support until some of the big cigars decided to devote their resources to save Division 1 sports. So here we are.


Get all these kids and their balls off my lawn!!!

First, I am sure we know what we are getting.
Second, I am sure everyone who finds a date on the internet thinks the photo is actually the person they are about to meet.
Third, I am 100% sure anyone who thinks the word of the NCAA or the pictures on Tinder are trustworthy is an idiot.

I bet we are certain we know our fate at the hands of the hypocrites...but I know we would all sleep much better if they publicly released that ruling and went on the record.

I also want to know if we get a discount for all services rendered for SMU by our esteemed former recruiter's new company? I mean, we get the pain and he gets a new job...a little payback never got anyone in trouble....oh crap, and here we go again!


Your last paragraph is intuitive. Ulric is in a very good position to help SMU moving forward.
SMUstangs22
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2732
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 5:06 pm

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by SMUstangs22 »

Did we help set him up with this gig? If so then we turned a potential adversary into an ally?
hoopmanx
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4871
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:36 am

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by hoopmanx »

SMUstangs22 wrote:Did we help set him up with this gig? If so then we turned a potential adversary into an ally?


Ulric was never ever going to be an adversary. The barbershops are going to talk their talk but Ulric is and will always be an ally. He's a good dude that flew too close to the sun b/c that's what he was hired to do. Sometimes there are casualties.
SMUstangs22
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2732
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 5:06 pm

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by SMUstangs22 »

hoopmanx wrote:
SMUstangs22 wrote:Did we help set him up with this gig? If so then we turned a potential adversary into an ally?


Ulric was never ever going to be an adversary. The barbershops are going to talk their talk but Ulric is and will always be an ally. He's a good dude that flew too close to the sun b/c that's what he was hired to do. Sometimes there are casualties.


Great two posts. Thanks for the info. All very interesting.
Puckhead48E
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by Puckhead48E »

hoopmanx wrote:
Puckhead48E wrote:
Topper wrote:[quote="Puckhead48E"]Correct me if I'm wrong, but the school refused to join in the legal response to the death penalty. This led to the ruling that they lacked standing. This was pointed out many times during the PSU case where the state threatened to sue. I would say the softer approach would work better, but that goes against recent examples where the NCAA had been shown to new weak and relatively powerless. I wouldn't roll in with the whole dream team...just an impressive enough line to deliver the message that we will make it our goal to decimate the very foundation of the NCAA's existence of our penalty is anywhere within the same galaxy as UNC-VoTech Institute of the UnApplied Sciences.


You are correct. BTW, study how Jerry Tarkanian fought and won against the NCAA during the time period when we were given the DP. Totally different strategy and totally different outcome. There was a longstanding contingent at SMU who wanted to end varsity sports when the scandal hit in the 80s and they leapt to fill the power void when everyone else was implicated. They actually were happy to see the downfall of athletics. A handful of SMU supporters kept the whole thing on life support until some of the big cigars decided to devote their resources to save Division 1 sports. So here we are.


Get all these kids and their balls off my lawn!!!

First, I am sure we know what we are getting.
Second, I am sure everyone who finds a date on the internet thinks the photo is actually the person they are about to meet.
Third, I am 100% sure anyone who thinks the word of the NCAA or the pictures on Tinder are trustworthy is an idiot.

I bet we are certain we know our fate at the hands of the hypocrites...but I know we would all sleep much better if they publicly released that ruling and went on the record.

I also want to know if we get a discount for all services rendered for SMU by our esteemed former recruiter's new company? I mean, we get the pain and he gets a new job...a little payback never got anyone in trouble....oh crap, and here we go again!


Your last paragraph is intuitive. Ulric is in a very good position to help SMU moving forward.[/quote]
I would hope what looked like Larry being his usual team centric, support his team and coaches like his kids self might lend to some residual positivity here. Just hope we don't get screwed by am NCAA that suddenly decides to make a stand on stupid for no reason.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
User avatar
DanFreibergerForHeisman
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 16486
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 3:01 am
Contact:

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by DanFreibergerForHeisman »

SMUstangs22 wrote:Did we help set him up with this gig? If so then we turned a potential adversary into an ally?

Does he like his gig?
Shake It Off Moody
User avatar
smupony94
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 25665
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Bee Cave, Texas

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by smupony94 »

Yes
User avatar
RGV Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 17269
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by RGV Pony »

That wasnt the question
User avatar
smupony94
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 25665
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Bee Cave, Texas

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by smupony94 »

He was never an adversary
User avatar
LA_Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 15604
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 4:01 am
Location: El Porto, CA 90266

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by LA_Mustang »

Do you like your job!?
SMU-12 NCAA appearances, 1 Final Four
2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs

Image
User avatar
Bergermeister
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7132
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 3:01 am
Location: University Park

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by Bergermeister »

LA_Mustang wrote:Do you like your job!?

Maybe I didn't understand the question.
User avatar
Junior
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11513
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:56 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: NCAA Investigation?

Post by Junior »

Do you like being chief of police?
Derail the Frogs!
Post Reply