Top 25

smupony94 · Post by **smupony94** » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:51 pm

@PatrickEngel_ 6m6 minutes ago
More
SMU vs. NW for 25 in AP is interesting: same record (18-4), SMU is 2-2 vs. KenPom top 50 & NW is 3-2. SMU is 14-1 since Dec. 1, NW 13-2.

sadderbudweiser · Post by **sadderbudweiser** » Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:12 pm

Stallion wrote:Until we beat a Top 25 team there's a pretty strong argument that we haven't proved ourselves to be a Top 25 team. I'm not going to worry about. In fact, I think its pretty accurate considering team limitations

yup. we're nobody until we beat somebody.

SmooBoy · Post by **SmooBoy** » Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:18 pm

#27 in Coaches poll

Others receiving votes: Northwestern 73, SMU 33, USC 24, Miami 19, Middle Tennessee 9, UNC Wilmington 8, New Mexico State 7, Indiana 3, Nevada 3, Wichita St 3, Akron 1, Kansas State 1

Pony ^ · Post by **Pony ^** » Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:36 pm

unfortunately our schedule is extremely soft. Just have to keep winning.

You know it's a complete joke when Kansas goes to Rupp and beats Kentucky and loses a spot in the poll.

PonyLawExpress · Post by **PonyLawExpress** » Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:56 pm

Would love to be in the top 25 next week so our matchup with Cincy can be a matchup of ranked opponents.

ponyinNC · Post by **ponyinNC** » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:07 pm

Espn will find a way to make that happen

PonyFan32 · Post by **PonyFan32** » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:45 pm

smupony94 wrote:@PatrickEngel_ 6m6 minutes ago
More
SMU vs. NW for 25 in AP is interesting: same record (18-4), SMU is 2-2 vs. KenPom top 50 & NW is 3-2. SMU is 14-1 since Dec. 1, NW 13-2.

I understand why we're not ranked due to our schedule being weaker than anticipated, but man Northwestern's conference schedule so far is so underwhelming (like ours). I want them to make the tourney (as long as we do) just so they get off the "never been" list, but man what a conference schedule. Their conference wins are against all the bottom Big 10 schools. And the Indiana win came after Indiana lost their 3rd key player to injury. Playing Purdue and Wisconsin will tell us a lot about where they stand in reality.

LA_Mustang · Post by **LA_Mustang** » Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:50 am

Not many losses in the bottom half of the top 25 this week. #25 Northwestern will drop out after getting crushed in their only game of the week to Purdue. #20 ND has lost three in a row and they play UNC today so I gotta believe they drop out if they lose. #22 Creighton lost to Xavier so they might drop out but they also beat #16 Butler.

I think Iowa St jumps us with their win at Kansas and Xavier probably jumps us with their win over Creighton. I think we might land at #25 but the lack of respect for our team and league is real. Just got to keep winning.

lollaperuna · Post by **lollaperuna** » Sun Feb 05, 2017 9:04 am

I'm not going to think about this until the results are in on Monday. I was convinced last week that if we took care of business this week we would be in for sure, but there was just way too many upsets at the top and we needed them at the bottom.

What all of the top upsets really prove is that nobody is dominant and everyone is beatable but that's not how the poll voters will look at it.

Charleston Pony · Post by **Charleston Pony** » Sun Feb 05, 2017 9:49 am

SMU and Cincy (other than a loss to us at Moody) need to win out and meet again in the AAC Tourney finals for the AAC to have any hope of having 2 teams ranked this year. Only Temple has good non-conference wins against quality P5 programs so quite frankly our conference has not earned much respect. Time to get it done in the post season. Would be great to have both SMU and Cincy advance to Sweet 16 and for several other AAC teams to make noise in the NIT

sadderbudweiser · Post by **sadderbudweiser** » Sun Feb 05, 2017 10:31 am

I could really care less if we are 24-27 on Monday. What matters is we win out and pop Mic twice.

We are good enough to do it but it will require both luck and good health as well.

What a fun year.

SMUstangs22 · Post by **SMUstangs22** » Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:52 am

Couldnt care less. Not could. Not sure how our entire country got in the habbit of saying "I could care less". Lol its a non statement at that point.

I am not making a dig at you. I got in the habbit of saying it that way too. I still correct myself all of the time when I say it.

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Sun Feb 05, 2017 12:00 pm

SMUstangs22 wrote:Couldnt care less. Not could. Not sure how our entire country got in the habbit of saying "I could care less". Lol its a non statement at that point.

I am not making a dig at you. I got in the habbit of saying it that way too. I still correct myself all of the time when I say it.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/lexicon_vall ... might.html

SMUstangs22 · Post by **SMUstangs22** » Sun Feb 05, 2017 12:03 pm

CalallenStang wrote:
SMUstangs22 wrote:Couldnt care less. Not could. Not sure how our entire country got in the habbit of saying "I could care less". Lol its a non statement at that point.

I am not making a dig at you. I got in the habbit of saying it that way too. I still correct myself all of the time when I say it.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/lexicon_vall ... might.html

I give up haha

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Sun Feb 05, 2017 12:04 pm

SMUstangs22 wrote:
CalallenStang wrote:
SMUstangs22 wrote:Couldnt care less. Not could. Not sure how our entire country got in the habbit of saying "I could care less". Lol its a non statement at that point.

I am not making a dig at you. I got in the habbit of saying it that way too. I still correct myself all of the time when I say it.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/lexicon_vall ... might.html
I give up haha

I have been in your shoes. English is a strange nonsensical language at times

Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25

Re: Top 25