Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:50 pm
EastStang wrote:Most of us had positive expectations for this season and we ended up 1-11.
Shame on most of you....
Shame on most of you....
Page 5 of 6
Shame on most of you....
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:29 pm
I definitely think at the very least, you guys will double your wins. This is what is really going to get everyone's attention- I'm betting SMU covers every spread this coming season. Undefeated against the spread in JJ's first year there. 
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:48 pm
Mister V - Good to know about the spread - I am on my way to vegas I hope to see you there.
If our friends from Hawaii have such great faith in JJ then so will I. 7 games and at least 6 - sorry JT. If we win less than 6 I will be ok with it because we have a coach with vision and confidence.
Our SMU bad karma will slightly offset the greatness of JJ in his first year. The SMU football demons will be fully expelled by JJ in year 2.
If our friends from Hawaii have such great faith in JJ then so will I. 7 games and at least 6 - sorry JT. If we win less than 6 I will be ok with it because we have a coach with vision and confidence.
Our SMU bad karma will slightly offset the greatness of JJ in his first year. The SMU football demons will be fully expelled by JJ in year 2.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:28 pm
We will win. I have no doubt. How many games we will win how quickly is a prickly subject, and of course, pure conjecture.
But even the press is beginning to recognize that we coul dbe back on the bowl scene next year.
I've said it before, and somewhere today I read it in some press coverage. SMU was not 6 games away from a blow in terms of ability. We found ways to lose games becasue the coach ing was not up to par. We were not prepared, even when we knew exactly what we were getting into. Games after game we were getting pummelled by our own inability to cope with the obvious, repetitive strategies of other, mediocre teams.
With JJ, this will NOT happen. Form the second the ball is kicked off, our kids are going to be ready.
But even the press is beginning to recognize that we coul dbe back on the bowl scene next year.
I've said it before, and somewhere today I read it in some press coverage. SMU was not 6 games away from a blow in terms of ability. We found ways to lose games becasue the coach ing was not up to par. We were not prepared, even when we knew exactly what we were getting into. Games after game we were getting pummelled by our own inability to cope with the obvious, repetitive strategies of other, mediocre teams.
With JJ, this will NOT happen. Form the second the ball is kicked off, our kids are going to be ready.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:47 am
bump
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:27 am
Are ya'll really doing this thread again? Raising false hopes if you think you can win more than 5 games. Take the red and blue blinders off your eyes and WAKE UP! 2-10. 100% improvement over the previous year.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:34 am
We're going to go 908-2
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 12:26 pm
George S. Patton wrote:We're going to go 908-2
I like your confidence.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:42 pm
George S. Patton wrote:We're going to go 908-2
im afraid that could be the score of the Tech game...
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:56 pm
J.T.supporta wrote:George S. Patton wrote:We're going to go 908-2
im afraid that could be the score of the Tech game...
Our defense is not that good yet. No safety.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:11 pm
I still say we at least double last year's performance.
I am definitely longing for more wins than that.
I am definitely longing for more wins than that.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:12 pm
Double digit wins (including post season).
Other than that I have no expectations.
Other than that I have no expectations.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:02 pm
7
8 if we win our bowl game. And don't rag on me Stallion, I never rag on you. As for Jtstang, go ahead.
8 if we win our bowl game. And don't rag on me Stallion, I never rag on you. As for Jtstang, go ahead.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:06 pm
more then 2003
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:49 am
expony18 wrote:more then 2003
i sure as hell hope its more than 2003