Page 5 of 7
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:27 pm
by J.T.supporta
smupony94 wrote:J.T.supporta wrote:smupony94 wrote:
Funny how you can't smoke cigarettes in Austin anymore but you can carry up to an ounce of pot and only get a ticket
you can smoke both in Flamingo Cantina!

I knew you would go somewhere flaming

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:28 pm
by smupony94
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:35 pm
by White Helmet
NickSMU17 wrote:They need to ban it everywhere...and enforce it
If you dont like it go somewhere else, its simple
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:39 pm
by smupony94
White Helmet wrote:NickSMU17 wrote:They need to ban it everywhere...and enforce it
If you dont like it go somewhere else, its simple
Your motto for the day. I like it. Wish more people used that logic.
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:41 pm
by White Helmet
Its been a long day out here and too damn cold, makes me angry
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:48 pm
by EastStang
For those who favor banning cigarettes, I don't smoke, hate smoke, but people are hooked and should be allowed to smoke. The states make a killing off cigarette taxes. I don't smoke, so I'm happy to see others paying taxes for me. I bought Philip Morris stock because it almost always gone up and pays a great dividend. So, don't smoke, just profit off those who do.
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:55 pm
by White Helmet
Ahh the Vice Fund strategy
http://www.vicefund.com/
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:59 pm
by smupony94
EastStang wrote:For those who favor banning cigarettes, I don't smoke, hate smoke, but people are hooked and should be allowed to smoke. The states make a killing off cigarette taxes. I don't smoke, so I'm happy to see others paying taxes for me. I bought Philip Morris stock because it almost always gone up and pays a great dividend. So, don't smoke, just profit off those who do.
I also own MO and PM but don't like Medicare and insurance companies have to pay costs associated with smoking
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:01 pm
by HB Pony Dad
What no cathouses in Nevada?
I'm so disappointed!

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:04 pm
by White Helmet
The cathouses dont share very well with investors
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:05 pm
by HB Pony Dad
smupony94 wrote:
He needs to smoke what Clinton was smoking not cigarettes

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:13 pm
by smupony94
White Helmet wrote:The cathouses dont share very well with investors
They share well in other manners
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:21 pm
by NickSMU17
Luckily I live somewhere that does take action and ban it....
Dallas continues to be slow to the punch...
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:06 pm
by smupony94
A New Cigarette Hazard: ‘Third-Hand Smoke’
By RONI CARYN RABIN
Published: January 2, 2009
Parents who smoke often open a window or turn on a fan to clear the air for their children, but experts now have identified a related threat to children’s health that isn’t as easy to get rid of: third-hand smoke.
That’s the term being used to describe the invisible yet toxic brew of gases and particles clinging to smokers’ hair and clothing, not to mention cushions and carpeting, that lingers long after second-hand smoke has cleared from a room. The residue includes heavy metals, carcinogens and even radioactive materials that young children can get on their hands and ingest, especially if they’re crawling or playing on the floor.
Doctors from MassGeneral Hospital for Children in Boston coined the term “third-hand smokeâ€
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 3:41 pm
by PoconoPony
smupony94 wrote:EastStang wrote:For those who favor banning cigarettes, I don't smoke, hate smoke, but people are hooked and should be allowed to smoke. The states make a killing off cigarette taxes. I don't smoke, so I'm happy to see others paying taxes for me. I bought Philip Morris stock because it almost always gone up and pays a great dividend. So, don't smoke, just profit off those who do.
I also own MO and PM but don't like Medicare and insurance companies have to pay costs associated with smoking
My health insurance company posts stastics indicating that they pay 65% more in medical costs over the life time of a smoker or tobacco user than a non-user.