Page 5 of 17
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:07 am
by NickSMU17
I see no such thing on ESPN
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:08 am
by skyscraper
Teams rumored to join in recent reports:
Air Force
Boise
Navy
UCF
Temple
East Carolina
Villanova
SMU
Now throw in conflicting stories, and it could be any of these six or teams not even mentioned.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:09 am
by BRStang
http://insider.espn.go.com/ncf/features ... %3dcommentOpen your eyes. It says, UPDATE: Big East Expansion: Air Force is not a likely target. SMU is.
Last updated by ESPN at 11:46 a.m. ET Oct. 10, 2011.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:11 am
by RednBlue11
BRStang wrote:http://insider.espn.go.com/ncf/features/rumors?id=8947&display=comment&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fncf%2ffeatures%2frumors%3fid%3d8947%26display%3dcomment
Open your eyes. It says, UPDATE: Big East Expansion: Air Force is not a likely target. SMU is.
HEY YOU! how about you copy and paste the damned thing? im asking for your own credibility cuz it is fleeing the building as we speak without any actual reporting to back up what ur saying...we all know '94 is full of [gary patterson] so we don't bother confronting him.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:11 am
by ColoStang
At one point it DID say Air Force Out, SMU In. That was a headline, it came from SOMEWHERE!
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:11 am
by StallionsModelT
If it's 12 we have a chance. Still not in their top four though. We are likely out.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:11 am
by ericdickerson4life
skyscraper wrote:Teams rumored to join in recent reports:
Air Force
Boise
Navy
UCF
Temple
East Carolina
Villanova
SMU
Now throw in conflicting stories, and it could be any of these six or teams not even mentioned.
They've already kicked Temple out once (not that long ago).
Villanova would have to commit as an institute to moving up in football (they've had the opportunity for a while now and have balked).
ECU has applied 12,000 times and to no avail.
Academies are shoe ins if they want to go.
UCF make all the sense in the world, if USF will allow it.
Boise brings BCS points and that sweet Boise market.
And SMU, well we are SMU.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:12 am
by NickSMU17
BRStang wrote:http://insider.espn.go.com/ncf/features/rumors?id=8947&display=comment&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fncf%2ffeatures%2frumors%3fid%3d8947%26display%3dcomment
Open your eyes. It says, UPDATE: Big East Expansion: Air Force is not a likely target. SMU is.
Last updated by ESPN at 11:46 a.m. ET Oct. 10, 2011.
Dude I have posted every insider article involving SMU...I just don't see it...
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:14 am
by ColoStang
Nick,
If you clicked on Rumor Central and don't have insider, that headline appeared. Given that you do have insider, you never saw it.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:15 am
by StangEsq
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:15 am
by NickSMU17
Got it...In this instance I wish I didnt have it...
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:16 am
by BRStang
I guess that explains it.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:17 am
by ponydawg
T
Big East Conference
TopEmailComments
7
Air Force is not a likely target. SMU is.
Subscribe to Insider for as low as $2.50/month to access the complete rumor
But I am poor, don't know what it says inside.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:19 am
by Hoop Fan
gotta think Air Force is included for sure otherwise why would their AD have been willing to be quoted in the Denver Post? Also, i bet Memphis is fishing around. Fedex money might be enough this time. SMU should be attractive to them but who knows its just a cluster of a numbers game. thats why i say 'earning' AQ status is a nice idea, but a scary proposition because you never know if there will be a spot once you supposedly earn it.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:20 am
by BRStang
RednBlue11 wrote:BRStang wrote:http://insider.espn.go.com/ncf/features/rumors?id=8947&display=comment&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fncf%2ffeatures%2frumors%3fid%3d8947%26display%3dcomment
Open your eyes. It says, UPDATE: Big East Expansion: Air Force is not a likely target. SMU is.
HEY YOU! how about you copy and paste the damned thing? im asking for your own credibility cuz it is fleeing the building as we speak without any actual reporting to back up what ur saying...we all know '94 is full of [gary patterson] so we don't bother confronting him.
