Re: DB Jeremy Hall will....
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:43 pm
President Turner,
My name is ..., I am a Cox(BBA)/Dedman(econ) graduate class of 2002. I am writing in regards to the recent developments concerning admission of football recruits.
I recently read the DMN story regarding 2010 recruit Jeremy Hall, who although was cleared through the NCAA clearinghouse was not admitted to SMU. This is a very troubling development for our athletic department.
As a young alumni, 30 in September, I noticed the recent improvement and dedication to winning athletics at SMU. This was a fantastic change from my years on the hilltop when mediocrity was tolerated. I made a decision at this point to contribute as much to the school as the school was willing to contribute to continuing to be a "top 25" program in everything we do. I recently donated at the Horseshoe level to the SMU mustang club, and bought stadium club seats for the upcoming season. Living in Chicago, this is a major commitment on my behalf to make these games with my wife and 2 month old daughter. I made this contribution with the belief that the school was committed to continuing its recent success.
The recent development, concerning Jeremy Hall, Ricky Collins, and other recruits is quickly making me regret my decision to donate to any part of the University. I was told numerous times that A.D. Steve Orsini could get any recruit allowed through the NCAA clearinghouse into the program. This development helps us compete with schools both in our conference, the state of Texas and nationally. I still believe we do not have the academic resources needed for these players, in terms of tutors, athlete friendly majors, and ability to transfer hours, but that is for another discussion.
Our recent success on the football field last year is the immediate cause of an increase in admission applications to the University and an increase in donations to the school. I don't have to tell you that last years' Hawaii bowl increased applications 30% to the school and Mustang Club donations almost doubled. It is athletics that help both students and alumni develop pride in their university and want to continue interaction both personally and financially. Pride and camaraderie among alumni and students is something that has been lacking at SMU since the death penalty years and we finally saw a glimmer of that pride and camaraderie last year. These decisions that SMU has made, to not allow admission to certain athletes, will immediately quash this glimmer and not allow students and alumni to develop a sense of community. Essentially, you guys are going to kill the momentum from last year, which is all we have right now. It is not a coincidence that TCU gets 30% more applicants than SMU.
Ultimately, I just don't want SMU to lie to me. My donation and commitment to flying into home games is a direct result of the hiring of June Jones, the Hawaii Bowl, and the promise from the school that the University was serious in competing. My donation was also based on the promise that SMU would compete on equal footing with all teams in the NCAA. These current developments have made me question my donation and continuing commitment to SMU. If the school wants to be a second tier player in athletics, that is fine, but please do not continue to make empty promises to me and all the other donors that are extraordinarily upset with SMU's direction right now.
With the current path we are on SMU is destined to remain a no-name athletic school...which ultimately means less donations and revenue for the school.
Thank you for your time in advance as I know how busy you are, but I love SMU and want to continue getting better in all areas of the university including athletics.
Sincerely,
...
We will see if I get any response...
My name is ..., I am a Cox(BBA)/Dedman(econ) graduate class of 2002. I am writing in regards to the recent developments concerning admission of football recruits.
I recently read the DMN story regarding 2010 recruit Jeremy Hall, who although was cleared through the NCAA clearinghouse was not admitted to SMU. This is a very troubling development for our athletic department.
As a young alumni, 30 in September, I noticed the recent improvement and dedication to winning athletics at SMU. This was a fantastic change from my years on the hilltop when mediocrity was tolerated. I made a decision at this point to contribute as much to the school as the school was willing to contribute to continuing to be a "top 25" program in everything we do. I recently donated at the Horseshoe level to the SMU mustang club, and bought stadium club seats for the upcoming season. Living in Chicago, this is a major commitment on my behalf to make these games with my wife and 2 month old daughter. I made this contribution with the belief that the school was committed to continuing its recent success.
The recent development, concerning Jeremy Hall, Ricky Collins, and other recruits is quickly making me regret my decision to donate to any part of the University. I was told numerous times that A.D. Steve Orsini could get any recruit allowed through the NCAA clearinghouse into the program. This development helps us compete with schools both in our conference, the state of Texas and nationally. I still believe we do not have the academic resources needed for these players, in terms of tutors, athlete friendly majors, and ability to transfer hours, but that is for another discussion.
Our recent success on the football field last year is the immediate cause of an increase in admission applications to the University and an increase in donations to the school. I don't have to tell you that last years' Hawaii bowl increased applications 30% to the school and Mustang Club donations almost doubled. It is athletics that help both students and alumni develop pride in their university and want to continue interaction both personally and financially. Pride and camaraderie among alumni and students is something that has been lacking at SMU since the death penalty years and we finally saw a glimmer of that pride and camaraderie last year. These decisions that SMU has made, to not allow admission to certain athletes, will immediately quash this glimmer and not allow students and alumni to develop a sense of community. Essentially, you guys are going to kill the momentum from last year, which is all we have right now. It is not a coincidence that TCU gets 30% more applicants than SMU.
Ultimately, I just don't want SMU to lie to me. My donation and commitment to flying into home games is a direct result of the hiring of June Jones, the Hawaii Bowl, and the promise from the school that the University was serious in competing. My donation was also based on the promise that SMU would compete on equal footing with all teams in the NCAA. These current developments have made me question my donation and continuing commitment to SMU. If the school wants to be a second tier player in athletics, that is fine, but please do not continue to make empty promises to me and all the other donors that are extraordinarily upset with SMU's direction right now.
With the current path we are on SMU is destined to remain a no-name athletic school...which ultimately means less donations and revenue for the school.
Thank you for your time in advance as I know how busy you are, but I love SMU and want to continue getting better in all areas of the university including athletics.
Sincerely,
...
We will see if I get any response...