PonyFans.com

OR-See-Nee wrote:Our receivers and RB are working hard.

Concerned about QB.

I'd like to know JJ's real thoughts about this team.

I think JJ fully understood we were going to take a beating; however, he expected better and more consistent QB play.

MustangSTATS wrote:

CalallenStang wrote:If you take away the 20 points we essentially gave to A&M, this looks like a close game.

If you take away the 43 points they have, we won by 14 and shut them out....

That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that we spotted them 20 points by making unforgivable mistakes. You can't convince me that the Aggies would have 43 if they hadn't started drives in our red zone.

I'm not saying we'd be winning, but it would look more like a 35-20 game than 43-14.

Wondering how they're going to spin this on the Stampede.

[quote="PoconoPony56% in a lower football division.[/quote]
Washington Huskies are in the PAC-12

PoconoPony wrote:

OR-See-Nee wrote:Our receivers and RB are working hard.

Concerned about QB.

I'd like to know JJ's real thoughts about this team.

I think JJ fully understood we were going to take a beating; however, he expected better and more consistent QB play.

I think you are correct.

Our D line hasn't made a play. Our D backs are playing off the receivers like we have seen for so many years. O line is out of their game and QB is a huge question at this time.

PurplFrawg wrote:[quote="PoconoPony56% in a lower football division.

Washington Huskies are in the PAC-12[/quote]

Sorry Froggie, Eastern Washington is not a PAC 10 school.

ponyte wrote:Pitiful effort. Way too many mistakes. And many were unforced. I am not encouraged with this effort. This isn't the type of SMU team we have been use to the last two years.

Really? This seems exactly like the SMU team I've watched the last few years. When you need them to show up the most, they don't.

PurplFrawg wrote:[quote="PoconoPony56% in a lower football division.

Washington Huskies are in the PAC-12[/quote]


So is Washington State, ask BLM how he threw the game with them away in 2009.

CalallenStang wrote:

MustangSTATS wrote:

CalallenStang wrote:That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that we spotted them 20 points by making unforgivable mistakes. You can't convince me that the Aggies would have 43 if they hadn't started drives in our red zone.

I'm not saying we'd be winning, but it would look more like a 35-20 game than 43-14.

I know, but either way it is a lose, but I see your point. Really thought we could contend this game.

ponyte wrote:Our D line hasn't made a play. Our D backs are playing off the receivers like we have seen for so many years.

Honestly, this was expected. A&M O-Line is FAR better than anything we will see in CUSA and our d backs aren't good enough to press.

PoconoPony wrote:

PurplFrawg wrote:[quote="PoconoPony56% in a lower football division.

Washington Huskies are in the PAC-12

Sorry Froggie, Eastern Washington is not a PAC 10 school.[/quote]

Sorry back at you. Eastern Washington was playing Washington. They lost by 3.

Still 1.5 recruiting classes away. That's been his motto for 3 years. And Orsini thinks this football program is worthy of AQ status?!

Concerns me too many of our admins deal in theoretical and not the real world.

Well I guess this is what we get for passing on Tod Dodge...



...just joking guys

PurplFrawg wrote:

PoconoPony wrote:

PurplFrawg wrote:[quote="PoconoPony56% in a lower football division.

Washington Huskies are in the PAC-12

Sorry Froggie, Eastern Washington is not a PAC 10 school.

Sorry back at you. Eastern Washington was playing Washington. They lost by 3.[/quote]

I stand corrected.