OFFICIAL SMU-CINCY GAME THREAD

[Junior]

they have to amend this rule. if it's not targeting there should be no penalty.

after review, we were wrong and shouldn't have called a penalty, but it's too late to take it back. 15 yards, cincinnati ball.

[SMU89]

Pick 6.

[Junior]

so they get 15 yards for what? i saw no pf

If they call targeting on the field it stands as a penalty even if review shows that there was no targeting. The review is just to see if the penalized player will be ejected.

makes even less sense when you explain it that way

[CenTXpony]

"We admit the call was wrong but you're still gonna be penalized."

Sounds like Obamacare

Haha I wasnt gonna say it.... but....

[Rayburn]

Pick 6.

From your post to God's ear.

[Grant Carter]

So if 57 had actually hit helmet to helmet could they have ejected him upon review and unejected 84?

[East Coast Mustang]

That targeting call was AWFUL

[Junior]

wow, quick makeup call

[CenTXpony]

Can I at least get an apology ref?

How 'bout a kiss.

He screwed us afterall.

Haha don't kiss while at work.

[Rayburn]

Time to play defense LET"S GO MUSTANGS!

[Rayburn]

Can I at least get an apology ref?

How 'bout a kiss.

He screwed us afterall.

Haha don't kiss while at work.

Forgot the whore's code!

[ponyte]

Dang, one would think since we moved up in conference that we would have gotten improved refs

[CenTXpony]

Hahahahahahaha

[Mustangs35SMU]

lol joke of a defense

[Rayburn]

Tickle tackle