Page 7 of 7
Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:33 pm
by Stallion
Get your head out of your [deleted]. You want me to compare Texas offers between Texas Tech and SMU right now
Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:36 pm
by Wuba
Stallion wrote:IGNORE^
2012 Tech Commitments:
Cunbie 2 1/2
Moore 1
McElroy 1
Mainored 1
Mounds 1
Brown 1/2
Shows that Tech has 7 commits from 6 different coaches. With the max for a single coach being 2.5.
SMU has 6 2012 commitments from 5 different coaches, with Hill having the most with 2.
I am surprised to see that so far in 2012 SMU and Tech have seen their commitments similarly distributed across their coaching staffs.
Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:38 pm
by ponyboy
Stallion wrote:Get your head out of your [deleted]. You want me to compare Texas offers between Texas Tech and SMU right now
No, I'm content with you showing your [deleted] on the recruiting imbalance thing for now. I'll hand you your head on the quality of recruits later.
Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:55 pm
by Stallion
Texas Tech has managed 31 Out of State Offers and yet was not Late to the Party in Texas:
March 17, 2011
Tech 42
SMU 9
April 26, 2011
Tech 47
SMU 12
May 17, 2011
Tech 48
SMU 18
Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:01 pm
by ponyboy
Not the subject, Kemosabe.
Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:29 pm
by Stallion
^ IGNORE