PonyFans.com

welcome back welcome back welcome backkkkk

glad i made it back in time for football season

The line by Vegas is a positive, definitely showing some respect for SMU..started at 5.5 and now at 6.

Here is Sporting News "Linemakers" with their summary and a Line of Texas Tech -6, Total 59.5

http://linemakers.sportingnews.com/ncaa ... eek-1-odds\

Actually I'm surprised it isn't closer. I would have set line at:

if Brewer healthy and plays: -8
if Davis Webb the freshman who played well spring practice plays: -4
if true freshman Mayfield plays: -2

I am changing my prediction after looking at the depth chart on Pony Pride. De's are LB size and OL is too much of a question mark. TTU- 38 SMU 28

SMU21TCU10 wrote:I am changing my prediction after looking at the depth chart on Pony Pride. De's are LB size and OL is too much of a question mark. TTU- 38 SMU 28

The depth chart on that site hasn't been updated in forever. It has Wimbley at backup running back, and he is on defense now. And the sizes are way out of date.

SMU 27
TT 21

Pony Up!

My biggest concern, is the O-Line. In year six, it should't be.

I have high hopes, but I fallback on being pessimistic. We need to win this game, but I don't want to feel punched in the stomach again.

TTU 31
SMU 24

Tech: 44
SMU: 17

Hate to say it, but I don't think its going to be pretty

Similar to last year's Baylor game. But not as bad.

SMU 56 TTU 27

SMU's defense shines, and Traylon Shead rips...

My expectations, sadly, are very low. I am very concerned about our defense and our midget WRs. (Nothing personal I just think we're a year away from finally having some quality D1 receivers who can make a true impact against quality competition (Joseph, Taylor, Gaines).

smumustang1980 wrote:SMU 56 TTU 27

SMU's defense shines, and Traylon Shead rips...

Giving up 27 points is not shining.