# 1 and 2!
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 11:56 pm
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 11:57 pm
Wish we had more of a 3rd threat, after that we don't have another receiver in the top 120
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:01 am
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:57 am
It's something...
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:14 am
just wait til next year
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:38 am
A little skewed given SMU has played 8 games while most of those players are at 7:
http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?y ... s&site=org
Of the 12 players averaging over 100 rec yds per game, 6 of them are in CUSA.
http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?y ... s&site=org
Of the 12 players averaging over 100 rec yds per game, 6 of them are in CUSA.
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:47 am
Also a little skewed by the fact that neither Robinson nor Sanders is leading in receptions, though - their total yards are insane. Keep it going, guys.
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:09 am
7 out of the top 10 receivers are from non-BCS schools.
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:34 am
SMU21TCU10 wrote:Wish we had more of a 3rd threat, after that we don't have another receiver in the top 120
Most teams don't even have 2 in the top 120.
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 7:25 pm
woo
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 7:28 pm
that's great raplh wrote:woo
wooo
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:23 pm
Pony Soup wrote:that's great raplh wrote:woo
wooo
woooo
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:25 pm
OH YEAH!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:27 pm
Stallion wrote:OH YEAH!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:41 pm
Boys...this is going to be commonplace around here for quite some time!!!