New JUCO?
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:38 am
See School JUCO sites
Seriously!BUS wrote:Still smiling and laughing about that blast of posts.
Perfect for this board that is becoming a labor to wade threw the advertising. And not even the paid advertising that pays for this site.
There are only a couple of people actually discussing recruiting as it is...everybody else is code talking.couch 'em wrote:If paysite based recruiting talk is run off of this board, then everyone will discuss paysite info on the pay sites.
Only a couple people will be left to discuss recruiting on ponyfans at all.
Thank you Xenujtstang wrote:There are only a couple of people actually discussing recruiting as it is...everybody else is code talking.couch 'em wrote:If paysite based recruiting talk is run off of this board, then everyone will discuss paysite info on the pay sites.
Only a couple people will be left to discuss recruiting on ponyfans at all.
If you code talk without saying anything, then you are really only talking to the subscribers anyway...why not do it on the pays sites?
jtstang wrote:There are only a couple of people actually discussing recruiting as it is...everybody else is code talking.couch 'em wrote:If paysite based recruiting talk is run off of this board, then everyone will discuss paysite info on the pay sites.
Only a couple people will be left to discuss recruiting on ponyfans at all.
If you code talk without saying anything, then you are really only talking to the subscribers anyway...why not do it on the pays sites?
Not only do you not mention their names, but also very little else about them. Just enough info to let your fellow subscribers know who you are talking about (code). So again since you subsribers are the only ones who know who you are talking about, why not do your talking on the pay sites?...not as much fun for you????SMU2007 wrote:No code talking dumba.ss. Just discussing the recruits without mentioning their actual name. How many posts a day can you make whining about your choice not to subscribe?
I was thinking offensive...but then what do I know...I don't subscribe.jtstang wrote:He's pretty defensive for a subscriber, huh PK?