Page 1 of 17
According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:31 am
by BRStang
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:33 am
by ericdickerson4life
Damn insider!
Is that good news?
According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:33 am
by goldenstang
This is getting ridiculous.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:34 am
by Comet
I thought the Big East moved on after TCU left them. So much changes so quickly with this stuff.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:35 am
by ericdickerson4life
So is the sky not falling now?
Need SMT to comment.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:36 am
by smupony94
So have we all pledged to not have multiple threads this week?
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:37 am
by RGV Pony
I'll say the same thing about us to BE that I thought about Boise St.
IF it's football only (which I would prefer), it would be a great move & step toward creating a national brand. There would be what, at most 4 trips to the east per year for away games, all kinds of exposure on the east coast, greater brand awareness, etc. Let basketball, equestrian and everything else compete in some conference that makes more geographic sense.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:38 am
by ericdickerson4life
I will not pledge anything.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:38 am
by PK
smupony94 wrote:So have we all pledged to not have multiple threads this week?
Don't be a spoil sport.

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:39 am
by NickSMU17
I dont see anything about SMU on insider today...
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:39 am
by smupony94
ericdickerson4life wrote:I will not pledge anything.
Keep your options open like we are doing with the SEC. They really want us but have put them on hold so we can pursue the CUSA-MWC merger.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:40 am
by Stallion
Without a Southern Division though its going to be a mess-probably still a step we have to take. But why in heavens would we want a Football only invitation. The Big East in BB is fantastic
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:41 am
by cutter
smupony94 wrote:So have we all pledged to not have multiple threads this week?
I will do my best, until something really, really exciting comes along. then, all bets are off.
Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:42 am
by MustangSTATS
Wait do I reply in the thread or make a new thread for my reply. This new multiple thread format has gotten so confusing.

Re: According to ESPN: SMU target of BE, not AFA
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:43 am
by smupony94
I propose merging all threads into one giant thread. Around the hilltop, football, basketball and other sports in one.