24-31 and 19-8
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:38 pm
The first number is the combined record of the six teams SMU has defeated, NW St., UTEP, Memphis, TCU, Tulane and UCF. That's a winning percentage of .436. NW St. (5-4) and TCU (7-2) have the only winning records.
The second number is the combined record of the three teams SMU has lost to, Texas A&M, So. Miss and Tulsa. A&M is 5-4, So. Miss is 8-1 and Tulsa is 6-3.
Here's what I think this means:
SMU has reached a point in the Jones era where it is/it has separated itself from the bottom rung programs and can usually beat the .500 teams and can find a way to pick off a traditional power (TCU -- rivalry and emotion filled game). That's good. SMU's influx of better talent in recruiting is revealing itself. SMU is minus 6 in the turnover ratio in those game but the other teams are so poor, the Mustangs can overcome the miscues.
SMU is still not there yet in terms of consistently in big-time games. That means the talent is not there yet. Now, all 3 losses were blowouts and were on the road. I would have thought this group was capable of picking off Tulsa but that didn't happen. The turnover ratio is minus 5 in those games. And the Mustangs are paying for it when they give it up.
In essence, the program is in that middle ground. Good enough to be competitive and occasionally get the big win. Not good enough to really contend for a conference title. However, the recruiting services recent ratings would suggest the inflow of student-athletes can potentially get the program to that next level. Maybe 2 years is what I'm thinking.
Everything is relative. Sure, we want to be winning as many games as possible. But the evidence doesn't support 9-3 - 11-1 every year -- YET. I think what we should understand is that when you come into a program in 2008 and find it a bit of wastland, the journey north demands patience.
In August, I suggested this team is capable of winning of at least 8 games. That goal still exists. The program is bowl eligible. Regardless of whether it's in Hawaii, Dallas, New Orleans or St. Petersburg, watching your team practice in December (always remember how important those extra practices are) it reveals how far it has come.
I've taken the approach of appreciating the journey, which all of us (a time or two) are guilty of not doing.
And this is coming from someone who is no fan of the current head coach.
Food for thought.
The second number is the combined record of the three teams SMU has lost to, Texas A&M, So. Miss and Tulsa. A&M is 5-4, So. Miss is 8-1 and Tulsa is 6-3.
Here's what I think this means:
SMU has reached a point in the Jones era where it is/it has separated itself from the bottom rung programs and can usually beat the .500 teams and can find a way to pick off a traditional power (TCU -- rivalry and emotion filled game). That's good. SMU's influx of better talent in recruiting is revealing itself. SMU is minus 6 in the turnover ratio in those game but the other teams are so poor, the Mustangs can overcome the miscues.
SMU is still not there yet in terms of consistently in big-time games. That means the talent is not there yet. Now, all 3 losses were blowouts and were on the road. I would have thought this group was capable of picking off Tulsa but that didn't happen. The turnover ratio is minus 5 in those games. And the Mustangs are paying for it when they give it up.
In essence, the program is in that middle ground. Good enough to be competitive and occasionally get the big win. Not good enough to really contend for a conference title. However, the recruiting services recent ratings would suggest the inflow of student-athletes can potentially get the program to that next level. Maybe 2 years is what I'm thinking.
Everything is relative. Sure, we want to be winning as many games as possible. But the evidence doesn't support 9-3 - 11-1 every year -- YET. I think what we should understand is that when you come into a program in 2008 and find it a bit of wastland, the journey north demands patience.
In August, I suggested this team is capable of winning of at least 8 games. That goal still exists. The program is bowl eligible. Regardless of whether it's in Hawaii, Dallas, New Orleans or St. Petersburg, watching your team practice in December (always remember how important those extra practices are) it reveals how far it has come.
I've taken the approach of appreciating the journey, which all of us (a time or two) are guilty of not doing.
And this is coming from someone who is no fan of the current head coach.
Food for thought.