Page 1 of 2

SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:56 pm
by Comet
I hope you guys realize how lucky we might be. We are on the verge of entering one of the top 2 basketball conferences in the country. Moreover, with the additions of BYU, Boise, Houston, UCF, and Navy, we somehow managed to get into one of the most unique AQ football conferences, and arguably a much stronger and appealing conference than the old Big East. Damn, how did Orsini and co. pull that off?

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:06 pm
by Topper
Add Notre Dame to the football mix and I will say that TCU missed a good opportunity.

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:08 pm
by skyscraper

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:12 pm
by LHS81
I was thinking more along the lines of Aerosmith's "Sweet Emotion."

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:13 pm
by fan
What happened to Air Force? That's some cred lost if they're not in. Who replaces them?

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:16 pm
by Comet
fan wrote:What happened to Air Force? That's some cred lost if they're not in. Who replaces them?

The current train of thought is that BYU is sort of the replacement for Air Force. They're vacillating at the moment so BYU will immediately take their spot but AF could still tag along at a later date. If someone with more info knows better than I do, feel free to jump in.

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:20 pm
by 03Mustang
Comet wrote:
fan wrote:What happened to Air Force? That's some cred lost if they're not in. Who replaces them?

The current train of thought is that BYU is sort of the replacement for Air Force. They're vacillating at the moment so BYU will immediately take their spot but AF could still tag along at a later date. If someone with more info knows better than I do, feel free to jump in.


Honestly, I wish there was a way to get Tulsa in as their replacement. I know they add nothing in terms of media market but they have been among the most consistent performers in C-USA over the last decade in both basketball and football.

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 9:40 pm
by Comet
03Mustang wrote:
Comet wrote:
fan wrote:What happened to Air Force? That's some cred lost if they're not in. Who replaces them?

The current train of thought is that BYU is sort of the replacement for Air Force. They're vacillating at the moment so BYU will immediately take their spot but AF could still tag along at a later date. If someone with more info knows better than I do, feel free to jump in.


Honestly, I wish there was a way to get Tulsa in as their replacement. I know they add nothing in terms of media market but they have been among the most consistent performers in C-USA over the last decade in both basketball and football.

I would agree, but Tulsa is such a minuscule school. It's a shame it doesn't have a larger student body or is placed in a larger city. Tulsa is the best example of managing one's scarce resources for the best possible results.

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:07 pm
by CalallenStang
Comet wrote:Tulsa is the best example of managing one's scarce resources for the best possible results.


Southern Miss is the best example of that, actually. They have the lowest (or close to the lowest) athletic budget in the country, and look at their athletic program

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:09 pm
by Charleston Pony
when I saw the title of this thread I thought the C of C had purchased a jet for the football team in anticipation of the travel demands the Big East will present

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:29 pm
by SMU_Alumni11
Steve Orsini is a mad genius of politics in athletics. I mean this is going to be a fun conference. I mean the only downside is that its not regional, but other than that it will be a lot of fun. I wish air force could get smart and jump in, but then again they would dominate the MWC and go to the great Hawaii and AFB and Liberty bowl ooooooo. Its sad to see a prestigious academy is this stupid. There is no benefit in being in a non AQ team. However, I was looking at Big East non-bcs bowl tie ins, they arent looking too good:
I mean #2 and #3 plays ACC...
#4 plays #7 Big 12 (hopefully freaking baylor)
#5 plays #9 SEC
#6 plays #5 CUSA (wouldnt that be fun...)
and thats it, again it is still miles better than CUSA but when we get in there, Orsini needs to get these bowl games to look better.

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:43 pm
by ojaipony
Sorry, I just can't get excited about joining the Big Least ... I'm sure I'm missing something but it has just never made any sense to me.

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:46 pm
by SMU_Alumni11
ojaipony wrote:Sorry, I just can't get excited about joining the Big Least ... I'm sure I'm missing something but it has just never made any sense to me.


Surely CUSA is just as or at least more of a downer?! I mean we arent traveling too far, we have Houston, got BYU, etc. Its certainly better than Tulane, Utep...

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:49 pm
by Pony ^
I'm pumped for big east

Re: SMU athletics is in for a sweet ride

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 12:54 am
by jpe747
BE may be a better choice than Big12. I agree that if all goes like it seems the BE will be an interesting mix. I see some interesting rivalry games forming. It could draw better press than B12. And, I'm not sure how long the Big12 stays together.