Page 1 of 1
Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:42 am
by huskerpony
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/co ... 0244.storyThese people aren't going to be happy when they don't have their automatic spots in the Rose Bowl, Sugar Bowl, or Fiesta Bowl some year.
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:42 am
by East Coast Mustang
Would a Big Ten team have made it this year w/o AQ?
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:43 am
by huskerpony
I think Wisconsin might have snuck up to 10, but I'm not sure without looking it up.
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:46 am
by East Coast Mustang
Yea they're 10
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:50 am
by SMU_Alumni11
I love how people want to end the BCS and AQ right when we are trying to make it to relevancy.... Basically the Top 10 teams will always be SEC and Big 12 with a sprinkle of Big 10 and PAC. Basically to kick ACC and BE out.
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:57 am
by huskerpony
Well, if the new Big East were already in play this year, Big East still would have been in, and Michigan would have been out. Would have been 4 SEC, 2 Big 12, 2 PAC 12, 1 Big 10, and Boise.
If Houston hadn't lost, it would have been two Big East teams and no Big 10. Not sure what Delaney is thinking on that one.
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:00 am
by East Coast Mustang
maybe he's drunk too
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:12 am
by SMU_Alumni11
huskerpony wrote:Well, if the new Big East were already in play this year, Big East still would have been in, and Michigan would have been out. Would have been 4 SEC, 2 Big 12, 2 PAC 12, 1 Big 10, and Boise.
If Houston hadn't lost, it would have been two Big East teams and no Big 10. Not sure what Delaney is thinking on that one.
No Im not drunk...
Had our teams been in the BE, Houston most likely have lost a hell of alot more games since the played the worst of CUSA, and got beaten by a decent USM team badly. Boise wouldnt have as many cupcake games, and they gotten beaten by TCU who we took down. So, most likely would of been between Boise and WVU.
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:13 am
by huskerpony
I think he meant delaney.
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:14 am
by East Coast Mustang
I meant maybe Delaney's drunk. Not you 11. Are you class of 11? you should be drunk right now
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:14 am
by East Coast Mustang
Actually nevermind you would've graduated in May. So you dont need to be drunk
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:16 am
by SMU_Alumni11
East Coast Mustang wrote:Actually nevermind you would've graduated in May. So you dont need to be drunk
I do enjoy alot of your comments, but I wish I was... studying for graduate finals is a [deleted]...
Re: Now Jim Delaney Says Eliminate AQ
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:38 am
by Pony64
I still hope a anti-trust lawsuit or Congress brings down the whole corrupt system. The BCS is a joke and the conference chairs are only protecting their own medieval fiefdoms by trying to defend it.