Page 1 of 2

Taylor Thompson

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:36 pm
by LA_Mustang
Not sure if this has been mentioned this but he had his first NFL catch two weeks ago and another last Thursday against the Steelers. Good to see another Pony doing things on Sundays.

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:41 am
by ponyte
Remember when JJ had that silly idea to use him as a receiver? Th nerve of JJ.

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:47 am
by ghost
Actually....turns out his high school coach (who had him at TE)had a better read on what Taylor's best position was all along until he got to SMU and the coach didn't adjust his offense for the talent on hand. Of course when you can fluctuate your weight between 250 -285 and stand 6'6" and can run a sub 4.6.......

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:01 am
by Junior
please don't argue that he wasn't a valuable player at DE for us. we all know he was a TE in HS.

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:15 am
by ponyboy
It's just another in a long line of lame attempts to shower hate on the current coaching staff. Do they deserve heavy criticism? Probably. But incessant, made up hate is just stupid.

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:40 am
by PK
ponyboy wrote:It's just another in a long line of lame attempts to shower hate on the current coaching staff. Do they deserve heavy criticism? Probably. But incessant, made up hate is just stupid.

From what I have read here, I don't think the hate is made up. Seems to be authentic. 8)

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:45 am
by Mustangsabu
PK wrote:
ponyboy wrote:It's just another in a long line of lame attempts to shower hate on the current coaching staff. Do they deserve heavy criticism? Probably. But incessant, made up hate is just stupid.

From what I have read here, I don't think the hate is made up. Seems to be authentic. 8)


Made me chuckle.

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:05 am
by Junior
ponyboy wrote:It's just another in a long line of lame attempts to shower hate on the current coaching staff. Do they deserve heavy criticism? Probably. But incessant, made up hate is just stupid.

But he had a catch in the nfl, so he must have been one of the greatest receivers ever, right? You have to forget all the great stuff he did as a DE on the basis of this one wonderful catch! Did they send that ball to Canton yet?

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:03 am
by Prairiepony
Preston Pearson who played for the Cowboys never played college football. Basketball at Illinois.
NFL scout saw him against Wisconsin and he decked a player. Scout was impressed. My memory is that the Colts drafted him and he played In the NFL for many years. You never know.

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:48 pm
by mavsrage311
I don't think any one was hating on the coaches for playing him at DE. He was a damn good DE and all-conference. He was needed more on the defensive side of the ball at SMU than as a TE. Nothing to see here folks, move along...

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:51 pm
by skurtn
From what I recall on ESPN, LSU and Alabama have been taking high caliber athletes and moving them to where they're needed; whether that's d or o.

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:18 pm
by PonyPlayer4
ghost wrote:Actually....turns out his high school coach (who had him at TE)had a better read on what Taylor's best position was all along until he got to SMU and the coach didn't adjust his offense for the talent on hand. Of course when you can fluctuate your weight between 250 -285 and stand 6'6" and can run a sub 4.6.......


June was the one that approached Taylor about playing TE in the pros..... Nice try

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:50 pm
by PoconoPony
skurtn wrote:From what I recall on ESPN, LSU and Alabama have been taking high caliber athletes and moving them to where they're needed; whether that's d or o.


All coaching staffs move kids around to meet team needs. A large % of kids will not play their high school position and another large % of kids will switch position from that for which they were recruited. No big deal.

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:55 pm
by Mustangs_Maroons
PoconoPony wrote:
skurtn wrote:From what I recall on ESPN, LSU and Alabama have been taking high caliber athletes and moving them to where they're needed; whether that's d or o.


All coaching staffs move kids around to meet team needs. A large % of kids will not play their high school position and another large % of kids will switch position from that for which they were recruited. No big deal.


True, but it is less common for a player to then switch back when they go to the NFL. The point of this thread, I think, is precisely that Jones didn't use him in his best position, which is in theory, the position he is being asked to play in the NFL. There IS a difference here, and it points to the fact that Jones not only does not recruit like he should but may not use the players in their optimal positions because his system is rigid and outdated.

Re: Taylor Thompson

Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:36 pm
by Junior
Mustangs_Maroons wrote:
PoconoPony wrote:
skurtn wrote:From what I recall on ESPN, LSU and Alabama have been taking high caliber athletes and moving them to where they're needed; whether that's d or o.


All coaching staffs move kids around to meet team needs. A large % of kids will not play their high school position and another large % of kids will switch position from that for which they were recruited. No big deal.


True, but it is less common for a player to then switch back when they go to the NFL. The point of this thread, I think, is precisely that Jones didn't use him in his best position, which is in theory, the position he is being asked to play in the NFL. There IS a difference here, and it points to the fact that Jones not only does not recruit like he should but may not use the players in their optimal positions because his system is rigid and outdated.

So, the fact that we don't use a TE for more than a few plays shouldn't factor into the decision to play him at DE where he can greatly impact a game?