JMU was also faster than SMU

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by Rebel10 »

People where I was sitting noticed and even made comments on how they were faster than SMU.
#HammerDown
User avatar
ObeyMyDog
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:14 pm

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by ObeyMyDog »

Most noticeable on qb draws. We knew it was coming and they knew we knew, and the guy still made our D look stuck in mud. The multiple gashes up the dead middle were a brutal combo of ineptitude on our part and a pure speed gap.

We'll flush out the deadweight we can and next season we'll forget about this crap, as emasculating as this was today.
Usually, the team that scores the most points wins the game - John Madden
User avatar
LakeHighlandsPony
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2558
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:50 am
Location: The Boneyard

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by LakeHighlandsPony »

And they tackle much better than we do.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 32038
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by mrydel »

What we are doing right now cannot be classified as tackling, or even an attempt at such. Need a lot of improvement both in technique and personnel
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Fresno Mustang
All-American
All-American
Posts: 844
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 2:41 am

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by Fresno Mustang »

Showed when their wideout beat our guy on a streak for a td in the third quarter. Beat him by five yards
SMU Class of 2014
User avatar
TidePony
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2342
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:36 pm

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by TidePony »

mrydel wrote:What we are doing right now cannot be classified as tackling, or even an attempt at such. Need a lot of improvement both in technique and personnel


Truth!
ftworthmustang
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:18 pm

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by ftworthmustang »

Fresno Mustang wrote:Showed when their wideout beat our guy on a streak for a td in the third quarter. Beat him by five yards


Our guy gave up on the play. It wasn't a speed issue. Their offensive coaches out-coached our defensive coaches. But even if the coaching was even, our defense is not talented enough to stop a good offense. We may have to score 50 points a game to win any more this year.
stc9
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1157
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:37 am
Location: Jax Beach, FL

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by stc9 »

LakeHighlandsPony wrote:And they tackle much better than we do.


I did a back of the envelope count last night on missed tackles. If we got a hand on the ball carrier and didn't bring him down I counted it. This doesn't take into account players being in the wrong place and didn't have a chance to make the tackle, nor does it take into account that it would have been a tough tackle to make anyway. Just somebody laid a hand on the ball carrier and failed to bring him down (didn't count Special Teams). Using this criteria we missed 32 tackles last night.
Some rise by sin, and some by virtue fall
vielsiehorsepower
All-American
All-American
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:25 pm

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by vielsiehorsepower »

stc9 wrote:
LakeHighlandsPony wrote:And they tackle much better than we do.


I did a back of the envelope count last night on missed tackles. If we got a hand on the ball carrier and didn't bring him down I counted it. This doesn't take into account players being in the wrong place and didn't have a chance to make the tackle, nor does it take into account that it would have been a tough tackle to make anyway. Just somebody laid a hand on the ball carrier and failed to bring him down (didn't count Special Teams). Using this criteria we missed 32 tackles last night.





Wow. That'sthe only word I have for that stat
docabel
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1507
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:48 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by docabel »

stc9 wrote:
LakeHighlandsPony wrote:And they tackle much better than we do.


I did a back of the envelope count last night on missed tackles. If we got a hand on the ball carrier and didn't bring him down I counted it. This doesn't take into account players being in the wrong place and didn't have a chance to make the tackle, nor does it take into account that it would have been a tough tackle to make anyway. Just somebody laid a hand on the ball carrier and failed to bring him down (didn't count Special Teams). Using this criteria we missed 32 tackles last night.



Was that 1st or 2nd half?
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by Rebel10 »

"Either you have speed or you are chasing it." We chased some yesterday.
#HammerDown
User avatar
JoeKidd
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1698
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:41 am

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by JoeKidd »

mrydel wrote:What we are doing right now cannot be classified as tackling, or even an attempt at such. Need a lot of improvement both in technique and personnel


Tackling was so bad...so many missed tackles....I would like to see their yard after contact vs. total rushing yards.
#Beat Clemson
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by Stallion »

I dunno-I'm not sure we laid a finger on the QB on his jaunts through the heart of the SMU Defense
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7234
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by JasonB »

ftworthmustang wrote:
Fresno Mustang wrote:Showed when their wideout beat our guy on a streak for a td in the third quarter. Beat him by five yards


Our guy gave up on the play. It wasn't a speed issue. Their offensive coaches out-coached our defensive coaches. But even if the coaching was even, our defense is not talented enough to stop a good offense. We may have to score 50 points a game to win any more this year.


We were horrible, no doubt. But to be fair that was 6, who normally starts for us. He didn't last night, and we put him in as a desperate attempt to stop something. He was obviously injured and pulled up lame on that play and I don't think he played again. 18 Played the rest of the game at corner. I think it was after 4 got hurt on the punt return.
vielsiehorsepower
All-American
All-American
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:25 pm

Re: JMU was also faster than SMU

Post by vielsiehorsepower »

JoeKidd wrote:
mrydel wrote:What we are doing right now cannot be classified as tackling, or even an attempt at such. Need a lot of improvement both in technique and personnel


Tackling was so bad...so many missed tackles....I would like to see their yard after contact vs. total rushing yards.



Probably balances out. There were plenty of rushes up the middle where Lee was untouched for 15 yards
Post Reply