Redshirts
Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 11:13 pm
Interesting news:

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It is a bit of head scratcher... maybe the crack lawyer team in Dedman have filed something in court to preempt us into letting us start the two waiver kids....skyscraper wrote:After whining the last two years about a short bench, Jank just shortened it again while we wait for two waiver decisions.
The issue wasn't the short bench, it was the number of players available for practice. We still have them available for practice, they just won't see game minutes. It has been nice to see 5 players on the court and 9 on the bench. Realistically, 4 to 6 of those 9 won't see much if any game minutes so now we know who they are and they should be motivated to compete and improve for future game minutes or transfer.SMU_Alum11 wrote:It is a bit of head scratcher... maybe the crack lawyer team in Dedman have filed something in court to preempt us into letting us start the two waiver kids....skyscraper wrote:After whining the last two years about a short bench, Jank just shortened it again while we wait for two waiver decisions.
That's true and valid by Dan that they can always burn them if we do get injuries.smitty329 wrote:The issue wasn't the short bench, it was the number of players available for practice. We still have them available for practice, they just won't see game minutes. It has been nice to see 5 players on the court and 9 on the bench. Realistically, 4 to 6 of those 9 won't see much if any game minutes so now we know who they are and they should be motivated to compete and improve for future game minutes or transfer.SMU_Alum11 wrote:It is a bit of head scratcher... maybe the crack lawyer team in Dedman have filed something in court to preempt us into letting us start the two waiver kids....skyscraper wrote:After whining the last two years about a short bench, Jank just shortened it again while we wait for two waiver decisions.