floridianstang wrote:ericdickerson4life wrote:SMU Section F wrote:I'm not necessarily saying I agree with this, but the committee has explicitly stated that their goal is to find the 4 "best" teams and not the 4 "most deserving" teams.
If that's what actually happens. Dumb. Go to 8 allow the conference winners of each P5 (regardless of rank or record) get a spot in the playoff and get 3 at larges. Let's go. Beating a team in the regular season HAS to count for something.
5 P5 champs
1 top rated G5 champ
2 at large
Get rid of the access bowls.
Tell them to give us a call and we can get this thing figured out. After that the argument (and good TV) would be about seedings. But every team would have a chance and it would all be settled on the field.