|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by smusic 00 » Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:08 am
East Coast Mustang wrote:People get too bent out of shape about these rankings so early, though. I think Ohio State was #16 in the inaugural poll last year, and Mississippi State was #1. Teams who are deserving will have plenty of opportunities to prove themselves in the coming weeks
Yup. Why do they even bother releasing this before the final announcement? Clicks?
-

smusic 00

-
- Posts: 6912
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:15 pm
- Location: Downtown
by CalallenStang » Thu Nov 05, 2015 7:52 am
smusic 00 wrote:East Coast Mustang wrote:People get too bent out of shape about these rankings so early, though. I think Ohio State was #16 in the inaugural poll last year, and Mississippi State was #1. Teams who are deserving will have plenty of opportunities to prove themselves in the coming weeks
Yup. Why do they even bother releasing this before the final announcement? Clicks?
Pretty much. ESPN wants ratings.
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
by RGV Pony » Thu Nov 05, 2015 7:56 am
smusic 00 wrote:East Coast Mustang wrote:People get too bent out of shape about these rankings so early, though. I think Ohio State was #16 in the inaugural poll last year, and Mississippi State was #1. Teams who are deserving will have plenty of opportunities to prove themselves in the coming weeks
Yup. Why do they even bother releasing this before the final announcement? Clicks?
On first read I thought it said chicks
-

RGV Pony

-
- Posts: 17269
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by mrydel » Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:16 am
Look at the conversation and controversy even though everyone knows it will change dramatically before the end. This is why they start early and this is why it will stay at 4 teams.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by mrydel » Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:17 am
West Coast Johnny wrote:mrydel wrote:The Big 12(10) just needs to man up and have a championship game and honestly have one true champion.
Ten team conferences are awesome. Regional football. Home & home basketball. Everyone plays everyone. Big 12 right now is the only conference that has things right - but sadly, market forces and money has forced mega conferences on us and we will have to endure Nebraska versus Rutgers & South Carolina versus Texas A&M.
When we could all be watching Kansas and Iowa State.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by MustangStealth » Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:03 am
West Coast Johnny wrote:mrydel wrote:The Big 12(10) just needs to man up and have a championship game and honestly have one true champion.
Ten team conferences are awesome. Regional football. Home & home basketball. Everyone plays everyone. Big 12 right now is the only conference that has things right - but sadly, market forces and money has forced mega conferences on us and we will have to endure Nebraska versus Rutgers & South Carolina versus Texas A&M.
You forgot TCU vs West Virginia. Hmmm I wonder why?
-

MustangStealth

-
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible
by CalallenStang » Thu Nov 05, 2015 10:28 am
A Frog fan extolling the virtues of regional conferences with all of the conference moving they have done is laughable, especially given that TCU hasn't shared a conference with its most regional rival in well over a decade.
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
by deepellumfrog » Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:52 am
CalallenStang wrote:A Frog fan extolling the virtues of regional conferences with all of the conference moving they have done is laughable, especially given that TCU hasn't shared a conference with its most regional rival in well over a decade.
We've been in a conference with Baylor for a while now...
-
deepellumfrog

-
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:07 pm
by Pony Boss » Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:17 pm
deepellumfrog wrote:CalallenStang wrote:A Frog fan extolling the virtues of regional conferences with all of the conference moving they have done is laughable, especially given that TCU hasn't shared a conference with its most regional rival in well over a decade.
We've been in a conference with Baylor for a while now...
3 years?
-

Pony Boss

-
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:22 pm
by Grant Carter » Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:30 pm
CalallenStang wrote:A Frog fan extolling the virtues of regional conferences with all of the conference moving they have done is laughable, especially given that TCU hasn't shared a conference with its most regional rival in well over a decade.
Fans are not required to agree with the decisions made by the teams/schools they support.
-
Grant Carter

-
- Posts: 2791
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am
by Dukie » Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:53 pm
Grant Carter wrote:CalallenStang wrote:A Frog fan extolling the virtues of regional conferences with all of the conference moving they have done is laughable, especially given that TCU hasn't shared a conference with its most regional rival in well over a decade.
Fans are not required to agree with the decisions made by the teams/schools they support.
I agree, nor is there an inherent conflict between generally preferring a regional conference and still supporting moves to some pretty far-flung conferences simply because those are the best options open to your school.
-
Dukie

-
- Posts: 2268
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Austin, Texas
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests
|
|