PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

BC Head Coach Fired!!!!

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Postby Dooby » Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:47 pm

expony18 wrote:
jtstang wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this was a particularly sorry move on BC's part?
extremely sorry


Very sorry. I would rather have a coach in demand than one that is not.
At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
User avatar
Dooby
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3005
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA

Postby Big Easy Pony » Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:54 pm

SMU 86 wrote:Wow, Gary Patterson would not last one year at BC.
Would love it if we got a chance to see if you're right.
User avatar
Big Easy Pony
Varsity
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 3:01 am
Location: New Orleans, La.

Postby ozfan » Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:37 pm

mrydel wrote:
jtstang wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this was a particularly sorry move on BC's part?


I keep thinking we will hear the other side of the story but it has not yet come out. I can not imagine denying someone the right to interview. Now if they leave while under contract, then action can be taken if you wish, but to fire someone just for talking to another person is pretty rough. And I agree that I think it will be a tough job to fill with a high caliber candidate.


I do not think it will be hard to fill. Some coach out in the cold with a family to feed and bills to pay will jump at the chance.
Sent from my KOREAN knockoff using Tapdance 5
ozfan
All-American
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia

Postby mrydel » Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:48 pm

ozfan wrote:
mrydel wrote:
jtstang wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this was a particularly sorry move on BC's part?


I keep thinking we will hear the other side of the story but it has not yet come out. I can not imagine denying someone the right to interview. Now if they leave while under contract, then action can be taken if you wish, but to fire someone just for talking to another person is pretty rough. And I agree that I think it will be a tough job to fill with a high caliber candidate.


I do not think it will be hard to fill. Some coach out in the cold with a family to feed and bills to pay will jump at the chance.


I do not define a out in the cold, family to feed and bills to pay, coach as a high caliber candidate.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Postby Mustangsabu » Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:53 pm

mrydel wrote:
ozfan wrote:
mrydel wrote:
jtstang wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this was a particularly sorry move on BC's part?


I keep thinking we will hear the other side of the story but it has not yet come out. I can not imagine denying someone the right to interview. Now if they leave while under contract, then action can be taken if you wish, but to fire someone just for talking to another person is pretty rough. And I agree that I think it will be a tough job to fill with a high caliber candidate.


I do not think it will be hard to fill. Some coach out in the cold with a family to feed and bills to pay will jump at the chance.


I do not define a out in the cold, family to feed and bills to pay, coach as a high caliber candidate.


Isn't Boston "out in the cold"? :D
User avatar
Mustangsabu
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4438
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby friarwolf » Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:00 pm

Sounds to me like BC was looking for a reason to move on............
friarwolf
Heisman
 
Posts: 1964
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:31 am

Postby ozfan » Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:21 pm

friarwolf wrote:Sounds to me like BC was looking for a reason to move on............
Sounds to me like the BC AD is living in the past. They want a long term coach. The practice today is for all coaches to look around unless the school is the golden egg etc Texas, USC, Florida.
Sent from my KOREAN knockoff using Tapdance 5
ozfan
All-American
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia

Postby Pony Soup » Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:04 pm

expony18 wrote:
jtstang wrote:Am I the only one that thinks this was a particularly sorry move on BC's part?
extremely sorry


pretty lame
It tastes better when served from a Bowl (game)!
Pony Soup
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: Austin, Tx

Postby PoconoPony » Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:15 pm

ozfan wrote:
friarwolf wrote:Sounds to me like BC was looking for a reason to move on............
Sounds to me like the BC AD is living in the past. They want a long term coach. The practice today is for all coaches to look around unless the school is the golden egg etc Texas, USC, Florida.


Press accounts also indicate the AD was very upset when his coach failed to inform him of his intention to interview. After learning of the scheduled interview, the AD then warned his coach that he would fire him if he interviewed. He expected his coach to honor the remaining 3 years on his contract. He had been afforded a 5 year contract to insure the long term stability of the program and recruiting. If the coach could not honor his committment to BU he would be fired. Coach had 3 days warning before the interview to decide his fate. He chose to interview and the AD was forced to back up his ultimatum.

Personally I admire the AD for taking a hard stance and seeking to protect the interests of his program. There is nothing more disrupting to any program than a coach who is always looking for the next deal and trolling for offers every year. Guys like Rodriguez and Petrino are prime examples and their true character is really revealed when the situation changes and they cannot live up to expectations. However, I fully understand that constant coaching changes and turn over is the norm and programs are forced to deal with the reality of the way the game is played in the sports world vs. the business world. At the same time, when a program makes a long term committment to a coach and is monetarily responsible to that coach ( win or lose) for the duration of the contract it should have expectations that the contract should be honored. Maybe the answer is big buck buy out clauses in contracts to stabilize the contract and compensate the program for their monetary losses. Rodriguez is the perfect example being afforded a new long term contract with a $4,000,000 buy out to restrict his seasonal trolling. When he jumped to Michigan he blatantly lied about having secret personal oral assurances from the then AD that his buy out would not be enforced. This alone should tell everyone everything they need to know about the credibility and trustworthyness of this weasle like person. Great response by WV to sue Rodriguez, expose his character in court and enforce the buy out.
PoconoPony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4436
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: Nesquehoning, Pennsylvania

Postby SMU 86 » Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:41 pm

PoconoPony wrote:There is nothing more disrupting to any program than a coach who is always looking for the next deal and trolling for offers every year.


So what do you think about Gary Patterson or Bob Stoops? Seems like every year Patterson is having his end of the year interviews.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown

________________________Champion________________________
Image
User avatar
SMU 86
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:41 pm

Previous

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests