PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Holy [deleted]

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Holy [deleted]

Postby East Coast Mustang » Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:07 pm

Rice and Texas State have higher ranked recruiting classes than ours right now

http://rivals.yahoo.com/smu/football/re ... 14/all/all
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
User avatar
East Coast Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7432
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby CalallenStang » Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:20 pm

I hate to say I told you so, so...Welcome to Miami!
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby Stallion » Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:28 pm

I guess you shouldn't look at Average Per Recruit where we are No. 108 in Rivals. This year there are so few 3 stars there is very little stratification between SMU, Texas St, UTSA, NTSU, UTEP, Rice and others schools that hardly ever get a Texas top 150 recruits. But its really hard to argue we are recruiting much higher than that level based on stars OR offers or even visits
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby blackoutpony » Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:30 pm

So does Central Michigan, Louisiana Tech, Bowling Green, Ball State, Arkansas State, Toledo, Southern Miss, Middle Tennessee, FIU, TULANE, Western Kentucky, Marshall, Temple, and Western Michigan. Oh we're tied with [deleted] Memphis.

These are just the teams that should have inferior programs to us.... pathetic......
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
User avatar
blackoutpony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4135
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:12 pm
Location: The Tomb of Ken Pye

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby East Coast Mustang » Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:37 pm

Drink up, BOP
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
User avatar
East Coast Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7432
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby JasonB » Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:42 pm

I am in no way saying that we have a rock star recruiting class, but if you have a subscription take a look at our ratings on ESPN.

Because rivals doesn't have as many three stars as in the past, all of the tweeners fall into two star category and look like the same level of recruit rice or UTSA is getting.

If you look at ESPN, with more detailed evaluation and ratings, you will see that while we are not where we want to be, the level of recruit for next year is certainly higher than Rice and UTSA.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7226
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby blackoutpony » Thu Jan 23, 2014 4:46 pm

JasonB wrote:I am in no way saying that we have a rock star recruiting class, but if you have a subscription take a look at our ratings on ESPN.

Because rivals doesn't have as many three stars as in the past, all of the tweeners fall into two star category and look like the same level of recruit rice or UTSA is getting.

If you look at ESPN, with more detailed evaluation and ratings, you will see that while we are not where we want to be, the level of recruit for next year is certainly higher than Rice and UTSA.


You don't need a subscription to look at ESPN's ratings. They're free which is why they're garbage. You like ESPN because everyone is a 3 start there and it makes your man crush June look less lazy. Even if ESPN list them as 3 stars, almost none of them have any kind of offers to back them up.
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
User avatar
blackoutpony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4135
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:12 pm
Location: The Tomb of Ken Pye

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby Stallion » Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:06 pm

if you go by ESPN, something like 93.5% of the commits at USF, Cincy, Houston and UCF are 3 or 4 stars. Its ridiculous- We also are behind Temple in ESPN where they have 1 Four Star and 16 Three Stars. They don't even have Tulane, Tulsa or ECU in their database. We would be beating Memphis (No. 93 in Rivals) and UConn (No. 106 in Rivals)
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby Grant Carter » Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:12 pm

blackoutpony wrote:
JasonB wrote:I am in no way saying that we have a rock star recruiting class, but if you have a subscription take a look at our ratings on ESPN.

Because rivals doesn't have as many three stars as in the past, all of the tweeners fall into two star category and look like the same level of recruit rice or UTSA is getting.

If you look at ESPN, with more detailed evaluation and ratings, you will see that while we are not where we want to be, the level of recruit for next year is certainly higher than Rice and UTSA.


You don't need a subscription to look at ESPN's ratings. They're free which is why they're garbage.


I do not know anything about ESPN ratings, but this argument does not hold water. You do not need a subscription to look at Rivals or Scout ratings either. Does that mean you think they are garbage too?
Grant Carter
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby blackoutpony » Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:24 pm

Grant Carter wrote:
blackoutpony wrote:
JasonB wrote:I am in no way saying that we have a rock star recruiting class, but if you have a subscription take a look at our ratings on ESPN.

Because rivals doesn't have as many three stars as in the past, all of the tweeners fall into two star category and look like the same level of recruit rice or UTSA is getting.

If you look at ESPN, with more detailed evaluation and ratings, you will see that while we are not where we want to be, the level of recruit for next year is certainly higher than Rice and UTSA.


You don't need a subscription to look at ESPN's ratings. They're free which is why they're garbage.


I do not know anything about ESPN ratings, but this argument does not hold water. You do not need a subscription to look at Rivals or Scout ratings either. Does that mean you think they are garbage too?


touché. My point is that Rivals and Scout make a living off selling subscriptions for recruiting articles and their site in general, that's not ESPN's M.O
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
User avatar
blackoutpony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4135
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:12 pm
Location: The Tomb of Ken Pye

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby Stallion » Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:30 pm

ESPN is only actively showcasing 6-7 conferences-the rest you can find but aren't even in their index
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby Rebel10 » Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:44 pm

We could be in trouble two years from now. But with Tulane, Tulsa, and ECU coming to the conference it might be okay because the conference will be getting weaker and not stronger. Also with JJ wanting to schedule down instead of recruit up that could artificially create wins with low level talent. The problem is when we face a talented team we could get beaten pretty badly. Our offer list looks pretty bad no matter what site view.
#HammerDown
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby well travelled pony » Thu Jan 23, 2014 6:10 pm

Rebel10 wrote:We could be in trouble two years from now. But with Tulane, Tulsa, and ECU coming to the conference it might be okay because the conference will be getting weaker and not stronger. Also with JJ wanting to schedule down instead of recruit up that could artificially create wins with low level talent. The problem is when we face a talented team we could get beaten pretty badly. Our offer list looks pretty bad no matter what site view.

Ecu beat unc and nc state. They have a dedicated fan base. Yes, the school is average, but they will be more a program than us if the current administration allows the jj trend to continue.

Go Ponies!
User avatar
well travelled pony
All-American
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: Castle Rock, CO

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby Pony ^ » Thu Jan 23, 2014 6:11 pm

another thing to notice is TCU falling off the map as well. They are fading very fast.
Pony ^
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:23 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Holy [deleted]

Postby Pony81 » Thu Jan 23, 2014 6:48 pm

Guys... We all know the score.
This staff knows they are done after 14. They also know they have to offer and sign kids to scholarships this year.
So they sign the best kids that they know or who want to come to SMU ( usually because it is clearly their best if only choice)

There is no actual recruiting going on other than returning phone calls and taking care of those in the fold.

No SMU coach is trying to talk a kid from going to another school.
Pony 81
Pony81
Heisman
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:09 pm

Next

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests