|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by smupony94 » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:06 pm
Pony up
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by b_caesar » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:08 pm
Samurai Stang wrote:b_caesar wrote:It only takes money.
And university support. Without Turner's backing for a practice facility, money is useless. And I highly doubt that money is the issue.
You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?
Don't worry. Be Happy. Or not.
-

b_caesar

-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:17 pm
- Location: North America
by smupony94 » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:11 pm
b_caesar wrote:Samurai Stang wrote:b_caesar wrote:It only takes money.
And university support. Without Turner's backing for a practice facility, money is useless. And I highly doubt that money is the issue.
You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?
Hopefully they would not go to him. Someone needs to fund the second century campaign as that is when he will leave
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by Samurai Stang » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:11 pm
b_caesar wrote:You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?
One must only ask himself which is more likely: 1. Turner hinders the athletic department 2. SMU has a shortage of wealthy alumni
Far East Conference
-

Samurai Stang

-
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:03 pm
- Location: Japan
by b_caesar » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:17 pm
Samurai Stang wrote:b_caesar wrote:You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?
One must only ask himself which is more likely: 1. Turner hinders the athletic department 2. SMU has a shortage of wealthy alumni
Is that all? How easily fixed, then.
Don't worry. Be Happy. Or not.
-

b_caesar

-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:17 pm
- Location: North America
by Sammy 11 » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:21 pm
Pony_Fan wrote:Other than not having a IPF, how do our current facilities stack up against Baylor, Texas State, A&M, Houston, Rice, etc? Weight room, locker rooms, meeting rooms, practice fields, etc... Sterling Moore posted this on his FB page a while back - overview of Missouri - pretty cool facility http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2hVcebRA2E
If you are interested in what BU has you can find the football facilities at the following links. Stadium & Locker room- http://www.baylorbears.com/facilities/casey.htmlWeight Room at the on campus facility: http://www.baylorbears.com/facilities/weight.htmlIndoor Facility- http://www.baylorbears.com/facilities/allison.htmlSMU's: http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... ities.htmlYou guys have a good setup and while I feel our practice facilities and weight rooms can hold up against anyone not named Oregon I don't think any gap between our schools is going to cost recruits either way. We have a big edge with the indoor facility, you have a newer & nicer venue for your stadium. Both schools are probably going to build on which one they don't have in the next few years.
-
Sammy 11
-
by Pony_Fan » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:25 pm
With limited space it makes it difficult for SMU vs someone like UCF.
Baylorfan, thanks for the links.
Glad to hear we are upgrading our locker rooms - our stuff is already 10+ yrs old now.
-

Pony_Fan

-
- Posts: 6130
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Tx, USA
by Dutch » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:06 pm
Sammy 11 wrote:You guys have a good setup and while I feel our practice facilities and weight rooms can hold up against anyone not named Oregon I don't think any gap between our schools is going to cost recruits either way.
We have a big edge with the indoor facility, you have a newer & nicer venue for your stadium. Both schools are probably going to build on which one they don't have in the next few years.
we are in dallas, you are in waco.
Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally
-

Dutch

-
- Posts: 4377
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:56 pm
- Location: 75205
by Water Pony » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:13 pm
Samurai Stang wrote:b_caesar wrote:You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?
One must only ask himself which is more likely: 1. Turner hinders the athletic department 2. SMU has a shortage of wealthy alumni
Yawn! Your posts are a broken record. Turner is not the issue.
Pony Up
-

Water Pony

-
- Posts: 5524
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Chicagoland
by Samurai Stang » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:35 pm
Water Pony wrote:Samurai Stang wrote:b_caesar wrote:You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?
One must only ask himself which is more likely: 1. Turner hinders the athletic department 2. SMU has a shortage of wealthy alumni
Yawn! Your posts are a broken record. Turner is not the issue.
I presented the two possibilities for why it has not happened. If not one, then it must be the other. It is a matter of logic. All you have done is make a claim with no factual basis, instead drawing only upon your blind love for Turner. I understand that you somehow blame me for your consistent idiocy, but that is not my doing. Your poor attempts at belittling me will not make you any wiser.
Far East Conference
-

Samurai Stang

-
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:03 pm
- Location: Japan
by spacepony » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:45 pm
SStang you having a bad week?.....really?.....bad comments and no basis behind the statements. You are too far behind way too many time zones.
-

spacepony

-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:50 pm
by b_caesar » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:48 pm
Samurai Stang wrote:I presented the two possibilities for why it has not happened. If not one, then it must be the other. It is a matter of logic.
Then your logic is fatally flawed. One of your assertions cannot absolutely override the other, or vice-versa. I believe it is much, much more complicated than that. Boiling it down to one or the other is short-sighted.
Don't worry. Be Happy. Or not.
-

b_caesar

-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:17 pm
- Location: North America
by Samurai Stang » Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:13 am
b_caesar wrote:Samurai Stang wrote:I presented the two possibilities for why it has not happened. If not one, then it must be the other. It is a matter of logic.
Then your logic is fatally flawed. One of your assertions cannot absolutely override the other, or vice-versa. I believe it is much, much more complicated than that. Boiling it down to one or the other is short-sighted.
I understand your position. A third option of 'both' would have been more correct in regards to logic purposes. Even so, SMU has no shortage of wealthy boosters that have demonstrated a willingness to spend money. It is far, far more likely that the problem is not financial.
Far East Conference
-

Samurai Stang

-
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:03 pm
- Location: Japan
by b_caesar » Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:19 am
Samurai Stang wrote:b_caesar wrote:Samurai Stang wrote:I presented the two possibilities for why it has not happened. If not one, then it must be the other. It is a matter of logic.
Then your logic is fatally flawed. One of your assertions cannot absolutely override the other, or vice-versa. I believe it is much, much more complicated than that. Boiling it down to one or the other is short-sighted.
I understand your position. A third option of 'both' would have been more correct in regards to logic purposes. Even so, SMU has no shortage of wealthy boosters that have demonstrated a willingness to spend money. It is far, far more likely that the problem is not financial.
Agreed. Nor can it exclusively be the fault or hindrance, whether perceived or real, of RGT.
Don't worry. Be Happy. Or not.
-

b_caesar

-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:17 pm
- Location: North America
by Samurai Stang » Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:28 am
b_caesar wrote: Agreed. Nor can it exclusively be the fault or hindrance, whether perceived or real, of RGT.
That, however, I disagree upon. As president, Turner possesses a number of powers, enough to hinder the building of such a practice facility. He is entirely capable of directing the building situation in either direction.
Far East Conference
-

Samurai Stang

-
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:03 pm
- Location: Japan
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests
|
|