PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Facilities

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Facilities

Postby smupony94 » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:06 pm

Pony up
User avatar
smupony94
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 25665
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Bee Cave, Texas

Re: Facilities

Postby b_caesar » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:08 pm

Samurai Stang wrote:
b_caesar wrote:It only takes money.


And university support. Without Turner's backing for a practice facility, money is useless.

And I highly doubt that money is the issue.


You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?
Don't worry. Be Happy. Or not.
User avatar
b_caesar
Heisman
 
Posts: 1539
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: North America

Facilities

Postby smupony94 » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:11 pm

b_caesar wrote:
Samurai Stang wrote:
b_caesar wrote:It only takes money.


And university support. Without Turner's backing for a practice facility, money is useless.

And I highly doubt that money is the issue.


You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?

Hopefully they would not go to him. Someone needs to fund the second century campaign as that is when he will leave
User avatar
smupony94
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 25665
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Bee Cave, Texas

Re: Facilities

Postby Samurai Stang » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:11 pm

b_caesar wrote:You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?


One must only ask himself which is more likely:

1. Turner hinders the athletic department
2. SMU has a shortage of wealthy alumni
Far East Conference
User avatar
Samurai Stang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Japan

Re: Facilities

Postby b_caesar » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:17 pm

Samurai Stang wrote:
b_caesar wrote:You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?


One must only ask himself which is more likely:

1. Turner hinders the athletic department
2. SMU has a shortage of wealthy alumni


Is that all? How easily fixed, then.
Don't worry. Be Happy. Or not.
User avatar
b_caesar
Heisman
 
Posts: 1539
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: North America

Re: Facilities

Postby Sammy 11 » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:21 pm

Pony_Fan wrote:Other than not having a IPF, how do our current facilities stack up against Baylor, Texas State, A&M, Houston, Rice, etc?

Weight room, locker rooms, meeting rooms, practice fields, etc...

Sterling Moore posted this on his FB page a while back - overview of Missouri - pretty cool facility

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2hVcebRA2E


If you are interested in what BU has you can find the football facilities at the following links.
Stadium & Locker room- http://www.baylorbears.com/facilities/casey.html
Weight Room at the on campus facility: http://www.baylorbears.com/facilities/weight.html
Indoor Facility- http://www.baylorbears.com/facilities/allison.html

SMU's:
http://smumustangs.cstv.com/sports/m-fo ... ities.html


You guys have a good setup and while I feel our practice facilities and weight rooms can hold up against anyone not named Oregon I don't think any gap between our schools is going to cost recruits either way.

We have a big edge with the indoor facility, you have a newer & nicer venue for your stadium. Both schools are probably going to build on which one they don't have in the next few years.
Sammy 11
 

Re: Facilities

Postby Pony_Fan » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:25 pm

With limited space it makes it difficult for SMU vs someone like UCF.

Baylorfan, thanks for the links.

Glad to hear we are upgrading our locker rooms - our stuff is already 10+ yrs old now.
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Re: Facilities

Postby Dutch » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:06 pm

Sammy 11 wrote:You guys have a good setup and while I feel our practice facilities and weight rooms can hold up against anyone not named Oregon I don't think any gap between our schools is going to cost recruits either way.

We have a big edge with the indoor facility, you have a newer & nicer venue for your stadium. Both schools are probably going to build on which one they don't have in the next few years.

we are in dallas, you are in waco.
Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally
User avatar
Dutch
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4377
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: 75205

Re: Facilities

Postby Water Pony » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:13 pm

Samurai Stang wrote:
b_caesar wrote:You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?


One must only ask himself which is more likely:

1. Turner hinders the athletic department
2. SMU has a shortage of wealthy alumni



Yawn! Your posts are a broken record. Turner is not the issue.
Pony Up
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5524
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Facilities

Postby Samurai Stang » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:35 pm

Water Pony wrote:
Samurai Stang wrote:
b_caesar wrote:You really think that if someone walked into RGT's office on Monday with $5 mil for an IPF he would pass it up?


One must only ask himself which is more likely:

1. Turner hinders the athletic department
2. SMU has a shortage of wealthy alumni



Yawn! Your posts are a broken record. Turner is not the issue.


I presented the two possibilities for why it has not happened. If not one, then it must be the other. It is a matter of logic.

All you have done is make a claim with no factual basis, instead drawing only upon your blind love for Turner. I understand that you somehow blame me for your consistent idiocy, but that is not my doing. Your poor attempts at belittling me will not make you any wiser.
Far East Conference
User avatar
Samurai Stang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Japan

Re: Facilities

Postby spacepony » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:45 pm

SStang you having a bad week?.....really?.....bad comments and no basis behind the statements. You are too far behind way too many time zones.
User avatar
spacepony
Newbie
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Facilities

Postby b_caesar » Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:48 pm

Samurai Stang wrote:I presented the two possibilities for why it has not happened. If not one, then it must be the other. It is a matter of logic.


Then your logic is fatally flawed. One of your assertions cannot absolutely override the other, or vice-versa. I believe it is much, much more complicated than that. Boiling it down to one or the other is short-sighted.
Don't worry. Be Happy. Or not.
User avatar
b_caesar
Heisman
 
Posts: 1539
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: North America

Re: Facilities

Postby Samurai Stang » Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:13 am

b_caesar wrote:
Samurai Stang wrote:I presented the two possibilities for why it has not happened. If not one, then it must be the other. It is a matter of logic.


Then your logic is fatally flawed. One of your assertions cannot absolutely override the other, or vice-versa. I believe it is much, much more complicated than that. Boiling it down to one or the other is short-sighted.


I understand your position. A third option of 'both' would have been more correct in regards to logic purposes.

Even so, SMU has no shortage of wealthy boosters that have demonstrated a willingness to spend money. It is far, far more likely that the problem is not financial.
Far East Conference
User avatar
Samurai Stang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Japan

Re: Facilities

Postby b_caesar » Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:19 am

Samurai Stang wrote:
b_caesar wrote:
Samurai Stang wrote:I presented the two possibilities for why it has not happened. If not one, then it must be the other. It is a matter of logic.


Then your logic is fatally flawed. One of your assertions cannot absolutely override the other, or vice-versa. I believe it is much, much more complicated than that. Boiling it down to one or the other is short-sighted.


I understand your position. A third option of 'both' would have been more correct in regards to logic purposes.

Even so, SMU has no shortage of wealthy boosters that have demonstrated a willingness to spend money. It is far, far more likely that the problem is not financial.


Agreed. Nor can it exclusively be the fault or hindrance, whether perceived or real, of RGT.
Don't worry. Be Happy. Or not.
User avatar
b_caesar
Heisman
 
Posts: 1539
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: North America

Re: Facilities

Postby Samurai Stang » Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:28 am

b_caesar wrote:
Agreed. Nor can it exclusively be the fault or hindrance, whether perceived or real, of RGT.


That, however, I disagree upon. As president, Turner possesses a number of powers, enough to hinder the building of such a practice facility. He is entirely capable of directing the building situation in either direction.
Far East Conference
User avatar
Samurai Stang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Japan

PreviousNext

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests