|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by blackoutpony » Sat Oct 04, 2014 3:40 pm
footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
You seem to whine a lot
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
-

blackoutpony

-
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:12 pm
- Location: The Tomb of Ken Pye
by dirtysouthpony » Sat Oct 04, 2014 3:56 pm
Treadway21 wrote:And. Couple of missed field Goals. Time to Recruit a kicker. Those misses were momentum killers especially the second one.
Agreed Treadway. Can we go pilfer someone from soccer?
-
dirtysouthpony

-
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:30 am
by SMU1523 » Sat Oct 04, 2014 3:58 pm
dirtysouthpony wrote:Treadway21 wrote:And. Couple of missed field Goals. Time to Recruit a kicker. Those misses were momentum killers especially the second one.
Agreed Treadway. Can we go pilfer someone from soccer?
Absolutely agree. The kicker was terrible today. Really was a momentum killer after we recovered on the kickoff.
-

SMU1523

-
- Posts: 1350
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:03 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by dirtysouthpony » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:02 pm
footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
On the money dad. This was our fourth game against a top 25 team. Theu are conference mates so the talent disparity was greatly reduced. A running game would help us win 3 or 4 of our remaining games.
-
dirtysouthpony

-
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:30 am
by blackoutpony » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:06 pm
dirtysouthpony wrote:footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
On the money dad. This was our fourth game against a top 25 team. Theu are conference mates so the talent disparity was greatly reduced. A running game would help us win 3 or 4 of our remaining games.
FYI, TCU wasn't ranked when we play them.
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
-

blackoutpony

-
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:12 pm
- Location: The Tomb of Ken Pye
by ftworthmustang » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:09 pm
Right now, TCU is playing #4 OU even.
-
ftworthmustang

-
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:18 pm
by EconPony'10 » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:18 pm
dirtysouthpony wrote:footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
On the money dad. This was our fourth game against a top 25 team. Theu are conference mates so the talent disparity was greatly reduced. A running game would help us win 3 or 4 of our remaining games.
Oh yeah, I forgot, UNT was such a formidable opponent. What changed is that we finally had a QB that played semi acceptable. Even though the teams we have played were ranked, their defenses are middle of the road except for Baylor. We shouldve at least scored 20 in all of the games except Baylor this year
-
EconPony'10

-
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:36 pm
by footballdad » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:19 pm
blackoutpony wrote:footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
You seem to whine a lot
You seem to be an idiot. I'm just stating the truth.
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by Stallion » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:21 pm
I think they just took the receiver's reads out of June's Run N Shoot. Looked to me like QB knew exactly where he was going with the ball on each play. Did he find a secondary receiver? The ball was thrown in 3 seconds all day. Seriously
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by footballdad » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:25 pm
EconPony'10 wrote:dirtysouthpony wrote:footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
On the money dad. This was our fourth game against a top 25 team. Theu are conference mates so the talent disparity was greatly reduced. A running game would help us win 3 or 4 of our remaining games.
Oh yeah, I forgot, UNT was such a formidable opponent. What changed is that we finally had a QB that played semi acceptable. Even though the teams we have played were ranked, their defenses are middle of the road except for Baylor. We shouldve at least scored 20 in all of the games except Baylor this year
With that comment we'll just ignore anything you have to say in the future. TCU's defense is middle of the road you say? Clueless
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by footballdad » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:27 pm
Stallion wrote:I think they just took the receiver's reads out of June's Run N Shoot. Looked to me like QB knew exactly where he was going with the ball on each play. Did he find a secondary receiver? The ball was thrown in 3 seconds all day. Seriously
I saw the exact same routes and throws as we've always seen. Also saw a lot less pressure from an AAC level DLine as well as less talented AAC level DB's
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by Rebel10 » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:32 pm
footballdad wrote:Stallion wrote:I think they just took the receiver's reads out of June's Run N Shoot. Looked to me like QB knew exactly where he was going with the ball on each play. Did he find a secondary receiver? The ball was thrown in 3 seconds all day. Seriously
I saw the exact same routes and throws as we've always seen. Also saw a lot less pressure from an AAC level DLine as well as less talented AAC level DB's
We ought to roll Cincinnati then. Right?
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by EconPony'10 » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:34 pm
@footballdad Yeah since OU is not lighting them up right now at their place or anything... A&M just gave up 48 to Miss St... UNT currently giving up 42 pts and counting to Indiana.
-
EconPony'10

-
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:36 pm
by sbsmith » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:38 pm
Rebel10 wrote:We ought to roll Cincinnati then. Right?
122nd Total Defense 105th Scoring Defense If they let us dink and dunk our way down the field then we'll put up some points though we're not likely to stop them.
Last edited by sbsmith on Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
-Benjamin Franklin
-
sbsmith

-
- Posts: 9540
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:21 am
- Location: Dallas
by Junior » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:40 pm
blackoutpony wrote:footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
You seem to whine a lot
maybe so, but he's right.
Derail the Frogs!
-

Junior

-
- Posts: 11513
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:56 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests
|
|