footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
You seem to whine a lot
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
On the money dad. This was our fourth game against a top 25 team. Theu are conference mates so the talent disparity was greatly reduced. A running game would help us win 3 or 4 of our remaining games.
footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
On the money dad. This was our fourth game against a top 25 team. Theu are conference mates so the talent disparity was greatly reduced. A running game would help us win 3 or 4 of our remaining games.
FYI, TCU wasn't ranked when we play them.
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
On the money dad. This was our fourth game against a top 25 team. Theu are conference mates so the talent disparity was greatly reduced. A running game would help us win 3 or 4 of our remaining games.
Oh yeah, I forgot, UNT was such a formidable opponent. What changed is that we finally had a QB that played semi acceptable. Even though the teams we have played were ranked, their defenses are middle of the road except for Baylor. We shouldve at least scored 20 in all of the games except Baylor this year
footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
You seem to whine a lot
You seem to be an idiot. I'm just stating the truth.
I think they just took the receiver's reads out of June's Run N Shoot. Looked to me like QB knew exactly where he was going with the ball on each play. Did he find a secondary receiver? The ball was thrown in 3 seconds all day. Seriously
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
On the money dad. This was our fourth game against a top 25 team. Theu are conference mates so the talent disparity was greatly reduced. A running game would help us win 3 or 4 of our remaining games.
Oh yeah, I forgot, UNT was such a formidable opponent. What changed is that we finally had a QB that played semi acceptable. Even though the teams we have played were ranked, their defenses are middle of the road except for Baylor. We shouldve at least scored 20 in all of the games except Baylor this year
With that comment we'll just ignore anything you have to say in the future. TCU's defense is middle of the road you say? Clueless
Stallion wrote:I think they just took the receiver's reads out of June's Run N Shoot. Looked to me like QB knew exactly where he was going with the ball on each play. Did he find a secondary receiver? The ball was thrown in 3 seconds all day. Seriously
I saw the exact same routes and throws as we've always seen. Also saw a lot less pressure from an AAC level DLine as well as less talented AAC level DB's
Stallion wrote:I think they just took the receiver's reads out of June's Run N Shoot. Looked to me like QB knew exactly where he was going with the ball on each play. Did he find a secondary receiver? The ball was thrown in 3 seconds all day. Seriously
I saw the exact same routes and throws as we've always seen. Also saw a lot less pressure from an AAC level DLine as well as less talented AAC level DB's
@footballdad Yeah since OU is not lighting them up right now at their place or anything... A&M just gave up 48 to Miss St... UNT currently giving up 42 pts and counting to Indiana.
footballdad wrote:What changed you ask? Vey simple. We're playing in our own conference against similar competition instead of Baylor, TCU & Texas A&M.
(yeah, but what about UNT, we're still the worst team on the planet) said the SMU haters.
