PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

From ACC

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: From ACC

Postby PlanoStang » Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:02 am

Stanford is homeless. We’re not.
May the forth be with us.
User avatar
PlanoStang
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3255
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Plano, Texas USA

Re: From ACC

Postby redpony » Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:34 am

[quote="PlanoStang"]Stanford is homeless. We’re not.[/quoteL

Last I read they were still in the PAC4 More quality there with thosr 4 than the AAC.
redpony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 10968
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
Location: on the beach,northern Peru

Re: From ACC

Postby 3rdGenPony » Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:37 am

Fact.
3rdGenPony
Varsity
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 2:14 am
Location: Saint Louis, MO

Re: From ACC

Postby Topper » Wed Aug 23, 2023 12:02 pm

So do I understand correctly: Clemson, Florida State, UNC and NC State are blackballing us because they all want to leave the ACC and are only one vote short of the number necessary to dissolve the conference? They worry that Stanford and SMU will side with the others if such a vote arises? I've got news for NC State: Neither the B1G or SEC want them.
User avatar
Topper
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
Location: 19th Hole

Re: From ACC

Postby ponywhupp9202 » Wed Aug 23, 2023 12:54 pm

I have not been following this as closely as many, and definitely do not understand all of the nuance, but..........

Purely from a common sense fan perspective, it seems very square peg round hole of us to attempt to shoehorn an invite to the ACC where we know at least 2 marquis teams likely want to leave as soon as possible, thus creating a possible Big East 2.0 scenario.

I know there is no such thing as a PAC 4 media deal, but if those 4 teams somehow stay together, adding the best of the rest from the AAC and Mountain West to the remnants of the PAC looks like it would be a better fit for SMU, and maybe even for the PAC 4 teams too. Not an original idea I know, but still feels like a viable option if several variables fall into place.
User avatar
ponywhupp9202
Varsity
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:40 am
Location: Flower Mound, TX

Re: From ACC

Postby PonyEnergy » Wed Aug 23, 2023 1:55 pm

ponywhupp9202 wrote:I have not been following this as closely as many, and definitely do not understand all of the nuance, but..........

Purely from a common sense fan perspective, it seems very square peg round hole of us to attempt to shoehorn an invite to the ACC where we know at least 2 marquis teams likely want to leave as soon as possible, thus creating a possible Big East 2.0 scenario.

I know there is no such thing as a PAC 4 media deal, but if those 4 teams somehow stay together, adding the best of the rest from the AAC and Mountain West to the remnants of the PAC looks like it would be a better fit for SMU, and maybe even for the PAC 4 teams too. Not an original idea I know, but still feels like a viable option if several variables fall into place.


form a 10-team new look PAC now and then scoop up some of the ACC leftovers and other high performing AAC schools later for an eastern presence

Stan, Cal, Wash St, Ore St, Boise St, SDSU, Colo St, AF, SMU, Tulane
User avatar
PonyEnergy
Scout Team
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:33 pm

Re: From ACC

Postby orguy » Wed Aug 23, 2023 3:10 pm

Great excepting Boise. Stanford and Cal powers that be forbid their inclusion
in any potential alignment. Maybe substitute UNLV.
Last edited by orguy on Wed Aug 23, 2023 3:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
orguy
All-American
 
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:02 am
Location: SF bay area

Re: From ACC

Postby ShantyBoy » Wed Aug 23, 2023 3:10 pm

https://twitter.com/PeteThamel/status/1 ... 31775?s=20

Sources: The potential additions of Cal, Stanford and SMU to the ACC are again under serious consideration by the ACC. A small group of ACC presidents met Wednesday morning to discuss financial models that would come with the additions.
ShantyBoy
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2023 1:24 am

Re: From ACC

Postby EastStang » Wed Aug 23, 2023 4:02 pm

NC State is probably hoping for the NC governor to give them the VT deal with the B1G or SEC. You don't get UNC without us (then it was Miami and FSU). However the dynamics have changed. Those two conferences would say OK, just stay in the ACC and pick up the phon e and call Miami or VT or GT or Pitt.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12657
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: From ACC

Postby Dukie » Wed Aug 23, 2023 5:13 pm

ShantyBoy wrote:https://twitter.com/PeteThamel/status/1694435445877231775?s=20

Sources: The potential additions of Cal, Stanford and SMU to the ACC are again under serious consideration by the ACC. A small group of ACC presidents met Wednesday morning to discuss financial models that would come with the additions.


Nicole Auerbach essentially posted the same thing:

https://twitter.com/NicoleAuerbach/stat ... 7330936271
Dukie
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2254
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: From ACC

Postby PonyME » Wed Aug 23, 2023 5:27 pm

Two reputable sources. I still feel like it’s now or never and I’m glad to see the administration and donors are doing everything possible for ACC membership…it seems like an ideal end game for us. And regardless of some of the criticism I’ve seen in the chatter-verse about what SMU is offering behind the scenes, I think it’s a smart decision if it happens.
PonyME
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2021 6:49 pm
Location: Harpswell, Maine

Re: From ACC

Postby Hop Sing » Wed Aug 23, 2023 5:33 pm

It’s ABSOLUTELY the right thing to do, and if this actually happens (I believe it will) it will transform everything!
User avatar
Hop Sing
Varsity
 
Posts: 436
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2019 9:47 am

Re: From ACC

Postby ShantyBoy » Wed Aug 23, 2023 5:44 pm

ShantyBoy
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2023 1:24 am

Re: From ACC

Postby Graceland Tar Heel » Wed Aug 23, 2023 5:56 pm

EastStang wrote:NC State is probably hoping for the NC governor to give them the VT deal with the B1G or SEC. You don't get UNC without us (then it was Miami and FSU). However the dynamics have changed. Those two conferences would say OK, just stay in the ACC and pick up the phon e and call Miami or VT or GT or Pitt.

I am not an NC native (Tennessee, as you might guess), and I lived in NC only 2 years after graduating UNC. But I know UNC well, including its senses of obligation. UNC definitely would want to avoid ever leaving NCSU behind. That would be bad for the state and for its higher education more specifically. UNC also would be almost as loathe to leave Dook behind. The campus literally are 8 miles apart.i used to bicycle over to Dook all the time. And UNC and Dook Med schools are almost one in the way they work together.

So while FSU clearly wants out ASAP, UNC wants to find some way to save the ACC as a truly Major conference. And FSU and Clemson are the only members that average more than 70,000 fans per game, so having them is very important to that.

There are no easy answers for any of us right now. I am far from aline among UNC fans in opposing UNC going to either SEC or BT. But I fear that those 2 leagues and their corporate bakers are determined to kill the ACC so that can take the parts they want.
Graceland Tar Heel
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2023 8:12 pm

Re: From ACC

Postby Dukie » Wed Aug 23, 2023 6:01 pm

Ross Dellenger out with another positive article on Stanford/Cal/SMU, citing "multiple sources":

https://sports.yahoo.com/sources-acc-ex ... t0xi434sAZ
Dukie
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2254
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Austin, Texas

PreviousNext

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 44 guests