JUCOS

[Mickey]

I was believing that the quickest way to turn this around was to recruit some jucos. Now I think it is the only way out. Lets sign a QB, 2WR, DL, and OL from the Juco ranks and start the process of turning this around. 5, just give us 5!

[Thumper]

How about 2 on each side of the line of the line?

[Mustangunner]

---

<small>[ 11-03-2003, 05:52 AM: Message edited by: Smoo Power ]</small>

[DomerPony]

No to mercenaries. No to JUCOs.

[mpony]

How about NO to 0-9 and YES to JUCO's.

[The PonyGrad]

Regardless of the policy in general. This is a critical year to recruit JUCOs as the sophmore class is small.

[Dooby]

I think it is a little late to start recruiting impact Jucos for the 2004 season, unfortunately.

[GoRedGoBlue]

I don't understand the rediculous arguments.

WE CANNOT GET THEM INTO SCHOOL, PERIOD!!!!!

Therefore, we cannot recruit them (with a few exceptions).

This is akin to your accountant telling you that you are broke and then replying "Well, let's just go to the bank and get some more money".

[Dooby]

Originally posted by GoRedGoBlue:
I don't understand the rediculous arguments.

WE CANNOT GET THEM INTO SCHOOL, PERIOD!!!!!

Therefore, we cannot recruit them (with a few exceptions).

This is akin to your accountant telling you that you are broke and then replying "Well, let's just go to the bank and get some more money".

Well, yes and no. But the analogy certainly is wrong. It isn't that we cannot get them into school; it is that the coaches CANNOT get them in BECAUSE the school WILL NOT let them in.

[Diehard Pony]

Well Bennett has stated that he is going to bring in a JC QB so we will see.

And, as I think OP posted some time ago, if we are going to bring in a QB why stop there?

<small>[ 11-04-2003, 07:49 AM: Message edited by: Diehard Pony ]</small>

[Stallion]

....because we love to see Cheerleaders for the Administration like GoRedGoBlue admit for all to see that SMU truly isn't COMMITTED to compete on an even playing field with its natural and traditional rivals.