|
PI on second end zone INT?Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
PI on second end zone INT?Was there a pass inteference on the second interception that Hicks through in the end zone? It looked like the receiver got the crap knocked out of him while the ball was on the way there, but nothing was called. I never saw a replay, but this is what it look like from the stands.
Derail the Frogs!
Re: PI on second end zone INT?Quick replay I saw looked like the receiver broke right and the throw went left. Received ran into a defender. If that is what happened I do not know if the throw or the receiver made the wrong read.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: PI on second end zone INT?
Thanks, Mark. That may have been the case. The player looked like he got blasted from my vantage point, but I may have had a bad angle. Derail the Frogs!
Re: PI on second end zone INT?He was hit hard. I could not see it from my seats but saw a replay this morning on a highlight tape.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: PI on second end zone INT?Watching it live, I thought it was 100% PI. No replay was shown in the stadium.
Re: PI on second end zone INT?I did too but after watching on replay I'm less sure unless Walker was planning a back shoulder move-he may have just run wrong route because he went right and the ball went left. Still think that would routinely be called Pass Interference since the Official isn't supposed to assume that a receiver couldn't catch it
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Re: PI on second end zone INT?But I think the ball had passed him before he was hit.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: PI on second end zone INT?I thought it was PI for sure until I watched the replay. I can understand the no call. It wasn't catchable by a receiver because the receiver was running the opposite direction and the ball was thrown 5 yards behind him. Someone read the play wrong, or Hicks was actually trying to throw to the corner and didn't see the defender there because of the inside receiver's position.
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests |
|