|
Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIIModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
22 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIII knew the Big XII had sketchy academics, but this bad? Even Kansas is down there on the list.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/big-12-schools-ranked-academically-100036368.html UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIIhttps://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/smu-3613
we are #72. only UT ahaed of us.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIIimpressive however, I doubt if we have surpassed Rice. That takes away some of the credibility of the report.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIIRice is still well ahead of SMU at #15.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIIRecently ( 2017 ? ), SMU was ranked as high as 53. UT was 52.
UT is now 38. We are now 72. Not too "impressive" in my book.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIIIf anybody still thinks at this point that academics impact realignment well then, I've got a couple business deals I'd like to discuss with you.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIISMU was definitely in the mid 50s when I went there 20 years ago. Was usually a point away from A&M. Thanks, Turner.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII
It matters to the PAC-12.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII
Myself: SMU undergrad and later grad school. We were always ahead of TAMU. We still have better students but otherwise not. Turner has failed. Damned by low expectations and a weak BOT. If we get the PAC invite then there is hope. Crisis of leadership otherwise. Why is an Abilene Christian alum leading our University? If in fact places like Brown and Emory are schools SMU wishes to model itself after then why a lifetime appt for this west Texas man of little academic learning? Food for thought.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII
These are excellent questions.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIISay what you will about Turner, but he has cultivated a lot of lucrative relationships with donors. I have disagreed with him about a number of issues over the years, but SMU is on par with UT in terms of quality of undergraduates and far ahead of Baylor and TCU by that criteria. Those of us on Ponyfans are likely of the majority opinion that Turner has not demanded much of our AD. But I suspect that the decision on Hart's continued employment will be based on the opinions of the really big cigars. If we get into the PAC 12 it will quiet the criticism. If not, then I hope that the powers that be will look for more dynamic leadership.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIITCU has raised more endowment money during Turner's extended tenor. Under at least three presidents. I've heard that, "but look at the money he's raised!" So what!
Any executive that stands in place over 10 years in a non-profit allows the firm to decay under his demands. We've needed new blood for over 20 year. Turner, not Pye is most responsible for our dismal athletic performance for 30 years. Any time during his tenor he could have reversed the course. The only reason he is doing so now was the cost of his last extension. But, its just not athletics, its the Law School, the Business School and Dedman that has fallen on hard times. No strong leader wants to join a company where one man is in charge of everything, and there is no hope of him being replaced.
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII
He is from East Texas if you want to know....
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIITurner is a good fundraiser but..
Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XIIThis thread is getting boring with administration bashing as its focus.
Pony Up
22 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests |
|