PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby EastStang » Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:19 am

I knew the Big XII had sketchy academics, but this bad? Even Kansas is down there on the list.

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/big-12-schools-ranked-academically-100036368.html
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12568
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby bubba pony » Tue Apr 18, 2023 5:12 pm

https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/smu-3613
we are #72. only UT ahaed of us.
bubba pony
Heisman
 
Posts: 1538
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 3:01 am

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby redpony » Tue Apr 18, 2023 7:12 pm

impressive however, I doubt if we have surpassed Rice. That takes away some of the credibility of the report.
redpony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 10968
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
Location: on the beach,northern Peru

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby 3rdGenPony » Tue Apr 18, 2023 10:31 pm

Rice is still well ahead of SMU at #15.
3rdGenPony
Varsity
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 2:14 am
Location: Saint Louis, MO

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby orguy » Wed Apr 19, 2023 1:02 am

Recently ( 2017 ? ), SMU was ranked as high as 53. UT was 52.
UT is now 38. We are now 72. Not too "impressive" in my book.
orguy
All-American
 
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:02 am
Location: SF bay area

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby leopold » Wed Apr 19, 2023 12:56 pm

If anybody still thinks at this point that academics impact realignment well then, I've got a couple business deals I'd like to discuss with you.
User avatar
leopold
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4089
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby PNW_Stang » Wed Apr 19, 2023 2:58 pm

SMU was definitely in the mid 50s when I went there 20 years ago. Was usually a point away from A&M. Thanks, Turner.
User avatar
PNW_Stang
Varsity
 
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2019 3:04 pm

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby ponyboy » Wed Apr 19, 2023 5:12 pm

leopold wrote:If anybody still thinks at this point that academics impact realignment well then, I've got a couple business deals I'd like to discuss with you.

It matters to the PAC-12.
ponyboy
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 15134
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: University Park,TX US

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby orguy » Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:29 pm

PNW_Stang wrote:SMU was definitely in the mid 50s when I went there 20 years ago. Was usually a point away from A&M. Thanks, Turner.


Myself: SMU undergrad and later grad school. We were always ahead of TAMU.
We still have better students but otherwise not. Turner has failed. Damned by
low expectations and a weak BOT. If we get the PAC invite then there is hope.
Crisis of leadership otherwise. Why is an Abilene Christian alum leading our
University? If in fact places like Brown and Emory are schools SMU wishes to
model itself after then why a lifetime appt for this west Texas man of little academic
learning? Food for thought.
orguy
All-American
 
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:02 am
Location: SF bay area

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby Dukie » Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:33 pm

orguy wrote:
PNW_Stang wrote:SMU was definitely in the mid 50s when I went there 20 years ago. Was usually a point away from A&M. Thanks, Turner.


Myself: SMU undergrad and later grad school. We were always ahead of TAMU.
We still have better students but otherwise not. Turner has failed. Damned by
low expectations and a weak BOT. If we get the PAC invite then there is hope.
Crisis of leadership otherwise. Why is an Abilene Christian alum leading our
University? If in fact places like Brown and Emory are schools SMU wishes to
model itself after then why a lifetime appt for this west Texas man of little academic
learning? Food for thought.

These are excellent questions.
Dukie
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2108
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby Topper » Thu Apr 20, 2023 12:52 pm

Say what you will about Turner, but he has cultivated a lot of lucrative relationships with donors. I have disagreed with him about a number of issues over the years, but SMU is on par with UT in terms of quality of undergraduates and far ahead of Baylor and TCU by that criteria. Those of us on Ponyfans are likely of the majority opinion that Turner has not demanded much of our AD. But I suspect that the decision on Hart's continued employment will be based on the opinions of the really big cigars. If we get into the PAC 12 it will quiet the criticism. If not, then I hope that the powers that be will look for more dynamic leadership.
User avatar
Topper
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
Location: 19th Hole

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby Mexmustang » Thu Apr 20, 2023 1:32 pm

TCU has raised more endowment money during Turner's extended tenor. Under at least three presidents. I've heard that, "but look at the money he's raised!" So what!

Any executive that stands in place over 10 years in a non-profit allows the firm to decay under his demands. We've needed new blood for over 20 year.

Turner, not Pye is most responsible for our dismal athletic performance for 30 years. Any time during his tenor he could have reversed the course. The only reason he is doing so now was the cost of his last extension.

But, its just not athletics, its the Law School, the Business School and Dedman that has fallen on hard times. No strong leader wants to join a company where one man is in charge of everything, and there is no hope of him being replaced.
Mexmustang
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2993
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Highland Park, Texas

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby gostangs » Thu Apr 20, 2023 2:08 pm

orguy wrote:
PNW_Stang wrote:SMU was definitely in the mid 50s when I went there 20 years ago. Was usually a point away from A&M. Thanks, Turner.


Myself: SMU undergrad and later grad school. We were always ahead of TAMU.
We still have better students but otherwise not. Turner has failed. Damned by
low expectations and a weak BOT. If we get the PAC invite then there is hope.
Crisis of leadership otherwise. Why is an Abilene Christian alum leading our
University? If in fact places like Brown and Emory are schools SMU wishes to
model itself after then why a lifetime appt for this west Texas man of little academic
learning? Food for thought.


He is from East Texas if you want to know....
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby orguy » Thu Apr 20, 2023 11:23 pm

Turner is a good fundraiser but..
orguy
All-American
 
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:02 am
Location: SF bay area

Re: Why PAC teams won't head to Big XII

Postby Water Pony » Fri Apr 21, 2023 9:17 am

This thread is getting boring with administration bashing as its focus.
Pony Up
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5493
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland

Next

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests