Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Big12Mustang · Post by **Big12Mustang** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 5:51 pm

couch 'em wrote:I just hope B12M doesn't have a Lyle or Cox degree

Now you made it personal. What the hell does that have to do with anything?!

CenTXpony · Post by **CenTXpony** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 6:15 pm

Lol... Im enjoying the entertainment...

LHS81 · Post by **LHS81** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 6:24 pm

LHS81 wrote:Bambi likes this thread

TWALV33 · Post by **TWALV33** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 6:28 pm

Won't somebody just explain it to B12M.

He does have a point in that this is a fan forum, and we should all have that in common. It's kind of getting embarrassing beating up on him.

Those are interesting numbers he posted, the origin is suspect, but we(SMU) have either made them look favorable or the context is such....

If someone has something further to add, I would be interested in hearing it, since I myself do not know why it appears we have such high revenue.

Also that link doesn't seem very legitimate, has anybody found these numbers from another source?

LHS81 · Post by **LHS81** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 6:34 pm

TWALV33 wrote:Won't somebody just explain it to B12M.

He does have a point in that this is a fan forum, and we should all have that in common. It's kind of getting embarrassing beating up on him.

Those are interesting numbers he posted, the origin is suspect, but we(SMU) have either made them look favorable or the context is such....

If someone has something further to add, I would be interested in hearing it, since I myself do not know why it appears we have such high revenue.

Also that link doesn't seem very legitimate, has anybody found these numbers from another source?

Actually, I may be one of the few posters who don't beat up on Big 12. Don't necessarily agree with some of his post. But, I don't make personal attacks on other posters. . . Unless (said) poster wants to make personal attacks on me. Then the gloves come off. And all they need to do, is let me know how "deep in the sewer" they want to take it.

Big12Mustang · Post by **Big12Mustang** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 6:37 pm

LHS81 wrote:
TWALV33 wrote:Won't somebody just explain it to B12M.

He does have a point in that this is a fan forum, and we should all have that in common. It's kind of getting embarrassing beating up on him.

Those are interesting numbers he posted, the origin is suspect, but we(SMU) have either made them look favorable or the context is such....

If someone has something further to add, I would be interested in hearing it, since I myself do not know why it appears we have such high revenue.

Also that link doesn't seem very legitimate, has anybody found these numbers from another source?

Actually, I may be one of the few posters who don't beat up on Big 12. Don't necessarily agree with some of his post. But, I don't make personal attacks on other posters. . . Unless (said) poster wants to make personal attacks on me. Then the gloves come off. And all they need to do, is let me know how "deep in the sewer" they want to take it.

I have no quarrel with you LHS81 and I intend to keep it that way.

Big12Mustang · Post by **Big12Mustang** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 6:47 pm

Found another link. Similar numbers.

http://www.thekeyplay.com/content/2014/ ... t-revenues

PonyKris89 · Post by **PonyKris89** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 7:01 pm

This thread really had no business in going down the name calling road. Big12M just posted an interesting list. And it seemed he was asking questions we all might want to know the answers to.

But oh well├óΓé¼┬ª I hope that some of you doing the bullying don't get kicked off the board, that would be a real shame, as you guys provide a lot of insight.

Now, if anybody has anything interesting to add, Great!!

LHS81 · Post by **LHS81** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 7:12 pm

PonyKris89 wrote:This thread really had no business in going down the name calling road. Big12M just posted an interesting list. And it seemed he was asking questions we all might want to know the answers to.

But oh well├óΓé¼┬ª I hope that some of you doing the bullying don't get kicked off the board, that would be a real shame, as you guys provide a lot of insight.

Now, if anybody has anything interesting to add, Great!!

I like pie. . . At least I thought that was interesting

PonyKris89 · Post by **PonyKris89** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 7:16 pm

LHS81 wrote:
PonyKris89 wrote:This thread really had no business in going down the name calling road. Big12M just posted an interesting list. And it seemed he was asking questions we all might want to know the answers to.

But oh well├óΓé¼┬ª I hope that some of you doing the bullying don't get kicked off the board, that would be a real shame, as you guys provide a lot of insight.

Now, if anybody has anything interesting to add, Great!!

I like pie. . . At least I thought that was interesting

"I like steak"-- Danny B. from the Ticket

WordUpBU · Post by **WordUpBU** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:37 pm

Big12Mustang wrote:
PonyKris89 wrote:Interesting. SMU at #65, how ironic, seeing as we would like to be in the 65 or so haves when all is said and done. SMU should definitely move up a bit with much stronger Moody attendance for full year and higher prices.

Thanks for posting this.

I thought we were much lower than that, since the year before it was way less. This puts us as the #3 team in revenue for the G5..and I am not sure if this includes revenues from Moody this year.

That's from the equity in athletics website. Should be for 2012-13 year.

couch 'em · Post by **couch 'em** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:44 pm

TWALV33 wrote:Won't somebody just explain it to B12M.

He does have a point in that this is a fan forum, and we should all have that in common. It's kind of getting embarrassing beating up on him.

Those are interesting numbers he posted, the origin is suspect, but we(SMU) have either made them look favorable or the context is such....

If someone has something further to add, I would be interested in hearing it, since I myself do not know why it appears we have such high revenue.

Also that link doesn't seem very legitimate, has anybody found these numbers from another source?

it was explained to him, he just isn't interested in listening or asking useful questions, he is arguing on a subject that he knows he knows nothing about. Just posting wildly ignorant posts all over the place from day one bogging every thread down to subjects already discussed in detail 100 times on pony fans.

Big12Mustang · Post by **Big12Mustang** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:54 pm

couch 'em wrote:
TWALV33 wrote:Won't somebody just explain it to B12M.

He does have a point in that this is a fan forum, and we should all have that in common. It's kind of getting embarrassing beating up on him.

Those are interesting numbers he posted, the origin is suspect, but we(SMU) have either made them look favorable or the context is such....

If someone has something further to add, I would be interested in hearing it, since I myself do not know why it appears we have such high revenue.

Also that link doesn't seem very legitimate, has anybody found these numbers from another source?
it was explained to him, he just isn't interested in listening or asking useful questions, he is arguing on a subject that he knows he knows nothing about. Just posting wildly ignorant posts all over the place from day one bogging every thread down to subjects already discussed in detail 100 times on pony fans.

You are wrong. Nothing was explained, Stallion posted a theory on why revenues are that way and then put a link out there to try and reinforce his point. And I never argued about anything. Please read my posts before posting an automatic hateful response.

couch 'em · Post by **couch 'em** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:57 pm

Big12Mustang wrote:
Stallion wrote:

Look I've been following this [deleted] for year-I don't care what a piss-ant with his head up his [deleted] thinks. Why don't you show me how SMU can earn 52,000 million in revenue without including costs of tuition as an accounting trick from the university to the athletic program

If your theory is correct, then Tulane and Rice which are even more expensive than SMU would have comparable revenues.

Arguing

couch 'em · Post by **couch 'em** » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:59 pm

Big12Mustang wrote:
couch 'em wrote:
TWALV33 wrote:Won't somebody just explain it to B12M.

He does have a point in that this is a fan forum, and we should all have that in common. It's kind of getting embarrassing beating up on him.

Those are interesting numbers he posted, the origin is suspect, but we(SMU) have either made them look favorable or the context is such....

If someone has something further to add, I would be interested in hearing it, since I myself do not know why it appears we have such high revenue.

Also that link doesn't seem very legitimate, has anybody found these numbers from another source?
it was explained to him, he just isn't interested in listening or asking useful questions, he is arguing on a subject that he knows he knows nothing about. Just posting wildly ignorant posts all over the place from day one bogging every thread down to subjects already discussed in detail 100 times on pony fans.

You are wrong. Nothing was explained, Stallion posted a theory on why revenues are that way and then put a link out there to try and reinforce his point. And I never argued about anything. Please read my posts before posting an automatic hateful response.

So a link to a published article that reinforces his point is not explaining?

Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)

Re: Total Revenues by Team (2013)