SMU 86 wrote:What are some of the specific points that you think need to be addressed?
First, we need an unequivocal statement and a strategy from SMU - a strategy that would include alumni, students, athletes and former players. All of us who love SMU know the importance of rebuilding a competitive program. I've never heard President Turner voice a strong commitment. I think he owes this to the SMU community. The message is simple: if Stanford, TCU and Baylor can do it, why not SMU? Having a competitive program would be good for SMU and Dallas.
Having a competitive football program is not incompatible with academic excellence. All universities preach diversity, but when it comes to practicing this, many in the SMU administration have lost focus. One the former players I spoke with last week would have never been accepted under the current regime. Yet, this man finished his SMU degree and is now successful within the community. I believe the SMU administration has missed the mark and needs to hear more stories like this.
SMU has not executed well for a variety of reasons, and this leads all the way to the top. President Turner may have done well in other areas, but he has made a serious mistake in failing to appreciate the importance of a successful football program.