|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Pony ^ » Sat Sep 27, 2014 11:19 pm
funny people are making fun of tcu. pathetic.
-
Pony ^

-
- Posts: 5964
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:23 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Treadway21 » Sat Sep 27, 2014 11:30 pm
Yeah cause TCU and their fans blow - that doesn't change no matter how SMU does.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and doesn't care who wins. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
-

Treadway21

-
- Posts: 6586
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by footballdad » Sat Sep 27, 2014 11:32 pm
Pony ^ wrote:funny people are making fun of tcu. pathetic.
Fatterson and his merry band of convicts are always good for a few shots. They might be better than us but they certainly should be. They are nothing more than a mediocre Big 12 team until they prove otherwise. Not nearly as impressive as Baylor against us.
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by Treadway21 » Sat Sep 27, 2014 11:40 pm
Or A and M.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and doesn't care who wins. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
-

Treadway21

-
- Posts: 6586
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by HToady » Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:45 am
So basically, what you are saying is that TCU looked least impressive of the teams that gave you a beat down. In other words, "Our loss was not as impressive as our other losses?" How sad.
Let's assume you are correct, and in spite of what the statistics say, you are also saying the benchmark of SMU performance against TCU hasn't improved at all, and you are essentially not any better or more motivated to play TCU than the other teams mentioned?
Maybe this is why nobody goes to the games?
-
HToady

-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:00 pm
by floridianstang » Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:53 am
TCU would plow through UNT and it would not be competitive. They now have an offense that will do OK in the Big 12. They look good to beat Texas Tech, Baylor, ISU, Texas and Kansas this year.
-
floridianstang

-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:51 am
by gostangs » Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:56 am
It is sad. But that is our problem. And help is on the way.
Your problem is that TCU has a pretty weak offense, and is about to get drubbed in league play. And help is not on the way.
-
gostangs

-
- Posts: 12315
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas USA
by Treadway21 » Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:57 am
HToady wrote:So basically, what you are saying is that TCU looked least impressive of the teams that gave you a beat down. In other words, "Our loss was not as impressive as our other losses?" How sad.
Let's assume you are correct, and in spite of what the statistics say, you are also saying the benchmark of SMU performance against TCU hasn't improved at all, and you are essentially not any better or more motivated to play TCU than the other teams mentioned?
Maybe this is why nobody goes to the games?
No we are saying y'all suck and will be 5th in the big twelve. Your school sucks and always has. You city is inferior to Dallas. Do I need to continue. Oh and your coach is a fat [deleted] that sweats a lot and needs a towel girl to keep from pitting out all the other players and coaches on your sideline. He should be wearing suspenders like a fat 80 year old man. Lastly he can barely waddle down the sidelines without getting a rider up his backside. But he can moderately play a guitar - so he has that going for him.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and doesn't care who wins. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
-

Treadway21

-
- Posts: 6586
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by footballdad » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:02 am
HToady wrote:So basically, what you are saying is that TCU looked least impressive of the teams that gave you a beat down. In other words, "Our loss was not as impressive as our other losses?" How sad.
Let's assume you are correct, and in spite of what the statistics say, you are also saying the benchmark of SMU performance against TCU hasn't improved at all, and you are essentially not any better or more motivated to play TCU than the other teams mentioned?
Maybe this is why nobody goes to the games?
June gone, our program finally has a chance. TCU likely stuck in Big 12 mediocrity for eternity.
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by footballdad » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:04 am
floridianstang wrote:TCU would plow through UNT and it would not be competitive. They now have an offense that will do OK in the Big 12. They look good to beat Texas Tech, Baylor, ISU, Texas and Kansas this year.
Baylor? You've got to be kidding right? What makes you think TCU can beat Baylor?
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by gostangs » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:09 am
I don't think anyone but OU has a chance to beat Baylor. Baylor will beat TCU by 20.
-
gostangs

-
- Posts: 12315
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas USA
by floridianstang » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:36 am
footballdad wrote:floridianstang wrote:TCU would plow through UNT and it would not be competitive. They now have an offense that will do OK in the Big 12. They look good to beat Texas Tech, Baylor, ISU, Texas and Kansas this year.
Baylor? You've got to be kidding right? What makes you think TCU can beat Baylor?
Baylor has not beaten TCU by more than 3 points. TCU has rolled Baylor every time they win. 2012 the result in waco was 49-21 TCU
-
floridianstang

-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:51 am
by GiddyUp » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:39 am
And your explanation this year is?
-

GiddyUp

-
- Posts: 8227
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 5:48 pm
by TidePony » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:40 am
I think Baylor derails Fatterson by at least 28. And, Briles will have no mercy on TCU.
-

TidePony

-
- Posts: 2342
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:36 pm
by footballdad » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:43 am
floridianstang wrote:footballdad wrote:floridianstang wrote:TCU would plow through UNT and it would not be competitive. They now have an offense that will do OK in the Big 12. They look good to beat Texas Tech, Baylor, ISU, Texas and Kansas this year.
Baylor? You've got to be kidding right? What makes you think TCU can beat Baylor?
Baylor has not beaten TCU by more than 3 points. TCU has rolled Baylor every time they win. 2012 the result in waco was 49-21 TCU
1 point is all that matters and 2012 was when Baylor had no defense. Baylor's offense might not be quite what it was last year, but their defense is light years ahead of where it's ever been. That D Line is arguably the best in the conference and Briles said as much prior to the season opener. Oklahoma and Baylor are 2 really good teams.
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests
|
|