|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by SoCal_Pony » Fri Nov 07, 2014 11:02 pm
mrydel wrote:SoCal_Pony wrote:Given all that SMU fans have been through over the past 30 years, including 0 championships under Turner's watch, you'd think if he was truly committed to athletics now he would allow MK to play this year. It's good for MK, it's good business for an athletic department burning cash, it's a good faith gesture to LB and if we happen to make a deep run in the NCAA tourney, it's good for admissions.
And yet we have the situation we do.
Speaks volumes to me.
Only problem is what if Turner does want him to but a tenured Prof does not? I do not know any of that to be the case but this could be an instance where Turner could not help even if he wanted to could it not? But yes, I agree, if any way possible, you get the kid on the court now.
If a 20-year PRESIDENT of a university allows a professor to run roughshod over him, it doesn't speak highly of the President or his commitment to the dispute at hand. At the end of the day, this is financially beneficial to the university and is accepted practice at tons of schools with equivalent or higher academics than us. Once again, if MK was a thug who committed a felony, I would view this differently. He's not and he's actually going to earn a decent and well-deserved salary as a professional BB player.
-

SoCal_Pony

-
- Posts: 5901
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
by mrydel » Sat Nov 08, 2014 8:35 am
I do agree.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by 78pony » Sat Nov 08, 2014 10:05 am
GiddyUp wrote:footballdad wrote:Think they'd find a way to get him on the court at Kentucky, Kansas, Duke, Michigan State, UConn, etc?
Irk Brown enough that he throws his hands up and retires and there goes the hoops program!
my biggest fear is we do something to irk Brown eventually. Yes.
Very legit concern.
-
78pony

-
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by No Quarter » Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:04 am
The lack of an IPF was one of JJs complaints and some say it should be promised ICW the attempt to lure the next coach. I am curious. How many members of P5 conferences have IPFs? Or maybe the better way to answer the question would be to list those who do not. And how many games would it have helped JJ prepare for during his tenure?
-
No Quarter

-
- Posts: 1509
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2000 4:01 am
by redpony » Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:46 am
Big12Mustang wrote: It looks like everyone on the AAC is on track to build IPF's, did we confirm that we are building one already?
Lots of 'lip service' but no action and not sure there are any immediate plans to do so.
-
redpony

-
- Posts: 10968
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
- Location: on the beach,northern Peru
by mrydel » Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:53 am
How many teams that have IPFs began to prosper only after getting one? It will not make us better.
If having plans to build one and a time table to do so would help in acquiring a better coach then so be it. But it is not necessary to be a good team, especially in the south. TCU built their program just fine without one.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by Big12Mustang » Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:14 am
mrydel wrote:How many teams that have IPFs began to prosper only after getting one? It will not make us better.
If having plans to build one and a time table to do so would help in acquiring a better coach then so be it. But it is not necessary to be a good team, especially in the south. TCU built their program just fine without one.
TCU has had a pretty nice IPF since 2006. And their football facilities are in the top of the big 12 now that they renovated the Carter. I know it is not going to "make us better" but it will make us look serious to potential coaches, recruits and the Dallas community, which thinks we have a football program just because...
-

Big12Mustang

-
- Posts: 2224
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:41 am
- Location: Uptown Dallas, TX
by footballdad » Sun Nov 09, 2014 11:34 am
No Quarter wrote:The lack of an IPF was one of JJs complaints and some say it should be promised ICW the attempt to lure the next coach. I am curious. How many members of P5 conferences have IPFs? Or maybe the better way to answer the question would be to list those who do not. And how many games would it have helped JJ prepare for during his tenure?
It's simply an extra feather in the cap for new coach when recruiting, no effect on wins or losses, chump change to SMU, just build the thing! Every other building on campus is nearly new or undergoing renovation, add it to the plan and get it done, what's the problem?
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by bobcat68 » Sun Nov 09, 2014 11:42 am
Even Highland Park high school has an IPF
-
bobcat68

-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:25 am
by GiddyUp » Sun Nov 09, 2014 11:57 am
bobcat68 wrote:Even Highland Park high school has an IPF
as does most HS around the area. Pretty ridiculous we don't. Maybe they can practice inside the indoor tennis courts 
-

GiddyUp

-
- Posts: 8227
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 5:48 pm
by CA Mustang » Sun Nov 09, 2014 12:16 pm
SoCal_Pony wrote:If a 20-year PRESIDENT of a university allows a professor to run roughshod over him, it doesn't speak highly of the President or his commitment to the dispute at hand.
So you are advocating that the university president should step in and overrule a professor (or two) to ensure select athletes remain eligible (regardless of the facts of the situation)? Wow... SoCal_Pony wrote:... is accepted practice at tons of schools with equivalent or higher academics than us.
Please provide examples where university presidents unilaterally changed grades to ensure the eligibility of athletes. mrydel wrote:How many teams that have IPFs began to prosper only after getting one? It will not make us better.
If having plans to build one and a time table to do so would help in acquiring a better coach then so be it. But it is not necessary to be a good team, especially in the south. TCU built their program just fine without one.
My point exactly. An IPF isn't the cure-all many hold it out to be.
-
CA Mustang

-
- Posts: 2693
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 4:01 am
- Location: Elk Grove, CA
by footballdad » Sun Nov 09, 2014 12:32 pm
CA Mustang wrote:SoCal_Pony wrote:If a 20-year PRESIDENT of a university allows a professor to run roughshod over him, it doesn't speak highly of the President or his commitment to the dispute at hand.
So you are advocating that the university president should step in and overrule a professor (or two) to ensure select athletes remain eligible (regardless of the facts of the situation)? Wow... SoCal_Pony wrote:... is accepted practice at tons of schools with equivalent or higher academics than us.
Please provide examples where university presidents unilaterally changed grades to ensure the eligibility of athletes. mrydel wrote:How many teams that have IPFs began to prosper only after getting one? It will not make us better.
If having plans to build one and a time table to do so would help in acquiring a better coach then so be it. But it is not necessary to be a good team, especially in the south. TCU built their program just fine without one.
My point exactly. An IPF isn't the cure-all many hold it out to be.
Wanna play with the big boys and keep Larry happy.....Just get it done! Never heard a single person on this board describe an IPF as a cure-all.....Just get it done!
-
footballdad

-
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by fifty » Sun Nov 09, 2014 2:20 pm
We have a slanted OPF. Isn't that good enough?
-
fifty

-
- Posts: 1483
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:51 pm
by Puckhead48E » Sun Nov 09, 2014 3:31 pm
Getting an IPF is not the answer, but that isn't the main issue. The act of funding, planning, and building the IPF and the statement that makes about administration support for the program is the most important aspect of an IPF. The statement, and the potential of increased upside, tell the story that SMU needs to tell; we are actually serious about this.
-
Puckhead48E

-
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:39 pm
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
|
|