NO SMU?
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Re: NO SMU?
by couch 'em » Tue Nov 11, 2014 1:23 pm
SMU students are too profit and party oriented to waste time on a pseudoscience brain exercise website
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
-EVERYONE
-
couch 'em 
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
Re: NO SMU?
by Insane_Pony_Posse » Tue Nov 11, 2014 3:21 pm
couch 'em wrote:SMU students are too profit and party oriented to waste time on a pseudoscience brain exercise website
No partying at UT?
C-ya @ Milos!
-
Insane_Pony_Posse - Posts: 4807
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 8:36 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas
Re: NO SMU?
by Topper » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:18 pm
Insane_Pony_Posse wrote:couch 'em wrote:SMU students are too profit and party oriented to waste time on a pseudoscience brain exercise website
No partying at UT?
I live a stone's throw from the UT campus. The party scene is active, but my impression is that the typical UT student resembles a Rice student much more than an SMU student in terms of their social lives. They aren't, as a group, as smart as the Rice kids, but their study and past time habits are much the same.
-
Topper 
- Posts: 2304
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: 19th Hole
Re: NO SMU?
by couch 'em » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:29 pm
Sure, but if 1% of students have an interest in these games you have thousands of game players. Same 1% at SMU like 50 undergrads.Insane_Pony_Posse wrote:couch 'em wrote:SMU students are too profit and party oriented to waste time on a pseudoscience brain exercise website
No partying at UT?
Plus reefer and menthols is more sedentary than coke and prescription drugs.
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
-EVERYONE
-
couch 'em - Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
Re: NO SMU?
by dirtysouthpony » Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:11 pm
Surprised to see that Richmond made the list and Sewanee was omitted.
- dirtysouthpony
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:30 am
Re: NO SMU?
by mrydel » Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:16 pm
dirtysouthpony wrote:Surprised to see that Richmond made the list and Sewanee was omitted.
Sewanee has never been the same since he left Rich Phillips.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-
mrydel - Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
Re: NO SMU?
by EconPony'10 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:27 pm
mrydel wrote:dirtysouthpony wrote:Surprised to see that Richmond made the list and Sewanee was omitted.
Sewanee has never been the same since he left Rich Phillips.
That 99 Sewanee team was mighty good
- EconPony'10
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:36 pm
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests